My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 09 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 09 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:38 PM
Creation date
9/6/2016 11:31:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2016 09 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 1, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />David Sinkey said there is a lack of clarity from the City. Does not have confidence <br />politically that going vertical development will be supported. Lack of use -by -right makes <br />it difficult to invest. <br />Mike Kranzdorf asked why there is no municipal bond or parking tax as a funding <br />option? DeJong agreed that should be on the list. <br />Wendell Pickett said this is a great problem to have. It is a problem if the City takes the <br />attitude of a bank — you should not expect money back on parking. Asking private sector <br />to pick up Operations & Maintenance (O&M) costs creates an additional tax. City must <br />be willing to commit land and fee waivers and pay a portion of O&M. If you start today <br />you are 4 — 5 years from having parking structure. Paid parking should be system wide. <br />Need to think outside the downtown area box. Have downtown employees park <br />elsewhere? <br />Council member Dennis Maloney reiterates that if the City had the money the City <br />would invest it. Another study would provide the same conclusion. If new public/private <br />partnership were presented, Council would consider it. <br />City Manager Malcolm Fleming said what we are looking for is what is the real cost to <br />build, what is the real cost to maintain, what does a system wide paid parking cost and <br />entail? That is where we need to start. Wendell Pickett said there are a lot of operators <br />that do that and could come up with a proposal. Will they respond to an RFP or will <br />they expect to be paid? It cost money to develop plans. Need to make a policy decision. <br />There are operators who will front the money. Need commitment from City to solve <br />problem. <br />David Sinkey said political insecurity is because Louisville is unsure if it wants to grow. <br />Wendell Pickett said the City needs to take the lead on it. Want to make parking more <br />available? Use paid parking. Commissioner Menaker replied absolutely not. That <br />pushes parking into neighborhoods. Pickett said to make neighborhood parking off <br />limits. Discussion continued of paid parking and the use of for-profit operators. <br />Scott Martin said paid parking does not necessarily need an operator. On street parking <br />can pay for a structure. <br />Commissioner Justen Staufer said we need parking restrictions on side street parking. <br />Parking structure will be used by people if there are restrictions on side street parking. <br />Blue Parrot parking is very convenient. City Council will have a lot of objections to paid <br />parking but putting it on the private sector relieves pressure on Council. Biggest fear is <br />that with Superior Town Center going in, they will draw business away because <br />Superior Town Center has convenient parking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.