My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1994 09 12
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1994 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1994 09 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:38 PM
Creation date
5/26/2004 10:14:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/12/1994
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1994 09 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
differential would be no more than about 10 to 15 <br />basis points from alternative #1 to alternative #2. <br />Alternative #2 being the more expensive. <br /> <br />Mayer wondered, since the sales tax is good for another nine years, was there an implicit limit on the <br />length of the bonds. <br /> <br />Cason stated that the nine year limit is built into the repayment revenue. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council adopt Resolution No. 49, Series 1994, including the ballot question <br />bonding open space as presented in alternative #1 with the amendments as noted by the city's bond <br />counsel to change open space sales tax to open space sales and use tax. Seconded by Levihn. Roll <br />call was taken. Motion passed by a 5 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION - GENERAL FUND (WRAP-UP) - FINAL BUDGET REDUCTIONS <br /> <br />Sharon Asti-Caranci, acting City Administrator, updated Council on Budget reductions from the last <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br /> <br />Mayer felt there was a lot of "slosh" in the Budget with regard to the Recreation Center, which he <br />wanted addressed before the Budget was finalized. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION - 1995 LEVYING OF GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES <br /> <br />Sharon Asti-Caranci, acting City Administrator, reviewed the calculations. Local growth would be <br />6% for next year. The calculation to be used in the Budget for inflation is 3.5%. The actual figure <br />won't be known until next February or March. For property tax the calculation is 6.0% (local <br />growth) + 3.5% (CPI) = 9.5% (maximum allowable increase in property tax revenue under Tabor 1). <br />That would generate $1,112,455 approximately in property tax dollars. The second calculation is <br />taking the new assessed value times the old mill levy generating $1,041,785. The third calculation <br />generates $1.1 - $5 million. The city has to take the most restrictive method, #2, keeping Louisville's <br />mill levy the same with the new assessed valuation, generating the $1,041,785, which is currently <br />included in the Budget. <br /> <br />Mayer suggested a mill levy decrease of 5.75, costing the city approximately $12,500. <br /> <br />Sisk felt the mill levy should remain the same. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council set the taxes for 1995 at the mill rate of 5.82 mills and utilize that for the <br />property tax limitation. Seconded by Levihn. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 4 - 1 vote <br />with Mayer voting against and Howard and Lathrop being absent. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.