Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 14, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />Councilmember Loo noted her concern that the proposed map does not have enough <br />information and can be misleading and scare some property owners and that can have <br />unintended consequences. She is concerned people see the map but not the <br />accompanying detailed information to truly understand it. <br />Mayor Muckle stated it is the job of the Council to make sure the public understands the <br />map and knows the City is not intending to take or condemn property based on this <br />map. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she thinks this is the first time commercially zoned <br />properties have been listed on the map as first tier priorities and that has been <br />concerning to business owners. <br />The Council reviewed the proposed acquisition map. Ms. Moshak noted the information <br />the board based the map on is only open space benefit; they did not look at other <br />information such as zoning or current ownership. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would like the City to be more proactive in the <br />acquisition of open space in general, through purchase or some other option. <br />Councilmember Leh asked the board to review what they want on the Phillips66 <br />property as clearly the City can't afford an outright purchase. <br />Ms Moshak agreed that in lieu of purchasing the property the board would like a large <br />parcel or lease option whereby the City gets a large portion for open space during the <br />development process. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton noted that in the future the community will rely on this parcel for <br />revenue so it is not likely we can leave the entire parcel as open space. However, if the <br />City could get something better than the ring around the property that Conoco would <br />agree to that would be beneficial. The property is privately owned with entitlements and <br />he is reluctant to let the public think a purchase is even viable. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he would like to see the map drawn to show what is most realistic <br />and note on the map that some of the acquisitions listed may not be total purchases, but <br />rather partial purchases or dedications through the land use process. <br />Councilmember Loo noted that commercial property pays 3.5 times the property tax that <br />residential property pays and to buy commercial property as open space it is taken off <br />the City's tax rolls. She is worried the map will raise the expectations of residents that <br />the City can purchase all of these properties when the City will never have enough <br />money to purchase even the Phillips66 property. <br />Councilmembers noted that some of the properties on the map are located in Boulder <br />County and have already reached their maximum development capacity (such as one <br />