My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2008 10 13 Joint Meeting
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2008 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2008 10 13 Joint Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 3:09:12 PM
Creation date
10/14/2008 10:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Also Known As (aka)
Revitaliztion Commission Joint Meeting
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2008 10 13 SP JOINT WITH LRC
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />North End <br /> <br />Address: <br /> <br />South Boulder Road and east of Plaza Drive <br /> <br />ParceD Size: <br /> <br />6.4 acres <br /> <br />Owners: <br /> <br />Mike Markel <br /> <br />Current Zoning: <br /> <br />PCZD (planned Community Zoning District) Planned Residential <br />(P-C) and Planned-Commercial (P-C) <br /> <br />Building Sizes: <br /> <br />o Approx. 60,000 s.f. of retail space <br />\& Assumed at 5/1 000 parking ratio <br /> <br />Property Attributes <br /> <br />o Green field site <br />" Master planned for interior connections to subdivision <br />o Neighborhood retail/service appeal <br />III Access along South Boulder Road <br />\11 Single Owner <br />o Traffic counts: 18,053 vehicles per day on South Boulder Road <br /> <br />Property Challenges: <br /> <br />e Small site <br />I) Mid block location <br />" Access limited to right in right out, or access from Louisville Plaza <br />\11 Limited home building to the north, no homes to the south of the site <br /> <br />Development Issues <br /> <br />o The site appears to be small and rather "forced" for retail. <br />III Ifretail is attracted, it would likely be small neighborhood services (aka bank, <br />convenience retail, strip space) which may impact surrounding existing retailers <br />e Query: Should this remain residential with the rest of the development? <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.