Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 10, 2017 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />from $2M to $500K for 2017 — 2021 Some of this is from the $2M open space <br />acquisition in 2017. No acquisitions are budgeted for 2018 and later <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted the capital costs from the Open Space & Parks Fund <br />could be paid from the General Fund Director Watson agreed; it is simply a way to <br />record it <br />Director Watson stated if we keep the same budgeting for 2018 and beyond with no <br />transfers from the General Fund, the deficit will accumulate dramatically <br />He noted options for funding the deficit, adding it is easier for the General Fund to have <br />a standard recurnng transfer so it is predictable and can be budgeted for Doing this <br />would keep the fund balance at the minimum balance required. Each year the Council <br />could determine if they want to transfer more or less depending on the needs that year. <br />There are many ways to do it; City Council just needs to determine how to do this. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if we don't fund everything out of the Open Space & Parks <br />Fund how will we know what qualifies as an Open Space & Parks Fund project and <br />what doesn't. Director Watson stated in the past we have funded whatever we <br />reasonably could out of Open Space & Parks Fund, then the City looks to other sources <br />for anything above that <br />Councilmember Loo noted she is frustrated in how items are determined to be eligible <br />for the Open Space & Parks Fund; it appears subjective Director Stevens stated it is <br />probably somewhat subjective; we make judgements on each project to determine if it <br />fits in the fund <br />Councilmember Maloney stated this is about funding deficits, not programmatic issues <br />City Council needs to keep the conversation focused on understanding what the <br />expenses should be and what should be the transfer from the General Fund When we <br />set the budget, we decided all of these expenditures are necessary. Every year we <br />need to address the programmatic issues and decide what is necessary or not He <br />noted it is hard to set a policy now for future budgets. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if we need to make cuts in the program to address <br />some of the deficit. Councilmember Stolzmann stated that is something to discuss when <br />we do the next biennial budget, but we need a policy now. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann liked the idea of covenng the operational deficit from the <br />General Fund She stated it was never intended that the tax be the only funding for <br />open space and parks. She suggested continuing to support parks from the General <br />Fund by using the 2007 levels (adjusted for inflation) and include tax revenue on top of <br />that. She stated she is open to reclassifying some CIP projects to other funds. She <br />would like to see a more conservative approach as to how we classify things as capital <br />costs She is also open to a transfer from the capital fund if needed <br />