Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />Debra Williams <br />Keaton Howe <br />David Hsu <br />Jayme Moss <br />Dietrich Hoefner <br />APPLYING <br />I would like to see Planning <br />FOR <br />Commission work with staff on <br />REAPPOINTM <br />addressing longer term and recurring <br />ENT ONLY: <br />issues, beyond typical land use <br />Should you be <br />hearings. Some of the longer term <br />reappointed, <br />what would <br />issues include the ones that are <br />involved in the answers to the <br />you like to <br />previous questions. Those issues are <br />see the <br />hard to address on an ad hoc basis, <br />Planning <br />applicant by applicant. Planning <br />Commission <br />Commission meetings could have <br />accomplish in <br />regular updates and discussions on <br />your next <br />term? <br />some of these longer-term issues. <br />More specifically, I would like to see <br />the Planning Commission update or <br />publish design guidelines to better <br />reflect current preferences and <br />practices. Some of the city's design <br />guidelines and standards are <br />outdated or seemingly arbitrary. For <br />example, applicants often ask for <br />waivers to the sign guidelines for the <br />Colorado Technology Center, and <br />these are often granted because we <br />do not know if the current sign <br />guidelines are effective. From our <br />previous audit of projects around the <br />city, we identified that bicycle and <br />pedestrian circulation may fall short <br />of the intent of design guidelines. I <br />would like to see the design <br />guidelines updated to better account <br />for bicycle and pedestrian <br />circulation. I also hope that the <br />design guidelines in accordance with <br />the McCaslin Small Area Plan will be <br />finalized in my next term. <br />11 <br />