Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 18, 2017 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Mayor Muckle proposed the Utility Committee look at some financial information and the <br />two Committees decide what is most valuable to them to help them make policy <br />decisions and have periodic joint meetings <br />Councilmember Keany stated the Utility Committee should sit with staff to determine <br />what information is really needed We should be looking at snow pack projections, the <br />waste hauler contract; we should not be looking at low level details <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton agreed with Mayor Muckle. He suggested all financial <br />information be given to the Utility Committee for a 6 -month test drive. Then get together <br />in 6 months and see how the division of responsibility is going. Once per year have the <br />full council look at the policy issues. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann disagreed; she stated financial review should be at the <br />Finance Committee. Finance knows the real time accounting revenue expenditures; we <br />shouldn't separate the functions. Sending the same reports to both committees is a <br />redundancy of effort. Don't see it this addressing any issues that need to be fixed <br />Director Kowar stated he sees the difference as the Finance Committee is what is <br />happening now, the Utility Committee us looking 5 years out for projects and planning. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated we can't separate the roles without all the information. He <br />stated he was not sure the Finance Committee wants to look at utility rates at an in- <br />depth level <br />Councilmember Maloney asked what problem we are solving That needs to be defined. <br />He restated his concern that items come to council with no review from either committee <br />and also neither committee has looked at the rate model before we look at budget <br />Finance is looking at profit and loss without any context about the rate model <br />Councilmember Keany the challenge is what is rolling over and what funds are already <br />committed or not <br />Councilmember Maloney stated his concern that no one is looking at the rate model, the <br />financial statements, and budget requests Neither Utility or Finance had the nght or <br />enough information to make a good recommendation. <br />Mayor Muckle stated someone needs to review items before they come to council <br />Councilmember Keany stated one or the other has to be more involved in the process <br />Councilmember Maloney agreed. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated there are a lot of areas that collect fee revenue and <br />we should not carve out the utility fees to have a different process. Carving out what the <br />Utility Committee does, doesn't solve the problem and it means the Finance Committee <br />does not look at the fees for our biggest enterprise. <br />