My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 01 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 01 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
1/17/2018 10:02:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 01 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 2, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />Councilmember Loo stated change is not specific enough. We need to know from <br />OSAB that they used preservation as a criteria, change may mean making it smaller, <br />which is not an option. She supports the language if it is also noted the DOLA won't be <br />made smaller. She is concerned the longer this drags out the more we are pitting some <br />residents against others She supports Mayor Pro Tem Lipton's motion, closure is not <br />an option and we need to send that message. She is sensitive to the Mayor's concerns, <br />but we need to send a clear message on this <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we all agree the DOLA should stay open However, we <br />have approved plans before where we didn't agree with every detail. We never made <br />statements about details in those cases, why do it in this case. He thinks we need to <br />respect the boards and their ability to fully discuss items We can make a statement but <br />we need to uphold the principal of not getting into what the boards discuss <br />Mayor Muckle reiterated closure is not a practical decision or even likely, but the <br />process matters. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton amended his motion to state "the City Council will communicate <br />to the public it has no interest in a permanent closure of the DOLA at Davidson Mesa <br />and supports OSAB's efforts to continue to develop a broad range of options and <br />recommendations to help improve the use and management of the DOLA and to ensure <br />its future sustainability." Councilmember Keany agreed to the amendment <br />Councilmember Leh thought there was a need to be honest that the effect of this motion <br />is that the recommendation with not include closure. He appreciates the Mayor's <br />concerns, but if we know closure is not an option we should just say that. He agreed <br />with the reticence to direct boards, but it is not unprecedented that Council directs a <br />board. Council is simply establishing limits <br />Vote on the Mayor Muckle's motion to direct OSAB to consider input from Council and <br />the public and to continue working on a management plan recommendation for the <br />DOLA and other areas Councilmember Maloney seconded the motion <br />Vote: Motion failed 1-5, Mayor Muckle voted yes. <br />Vote on Mayor Pro Tem Lipton's motion to state the City Council communicates to the <br />public it has no interest in a permanent closure of the DOLA at Davidson Mesa and <br />supports OSAB's efforts to continue to develop a broad range of options and <br />recommendations to help improve the use and management of the DOLA and to ensure <br />its future sustainability <br />Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.