Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 19, 2018 <br />Page 5of7 <br />Members decided to include one meeting to discuss what Council's policy is and <br />articulate that to the Historical Commission and History Foundation. <br />Members decided to have an additional meeting to discuss if polling is needed and what <br />it might include; the museum or other topics or a combination of topics on which to poll. <br />COMMUNITY DESIGN <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked about the #18 Sign Code Update as he would like it done <br />quickly but now it is attached to the design guidelines. He would like to make sure it <br />doesn't spill to 2019. Zuccaro stated there is no reason to think it cannot be completed <br />this year and there will be a public process with it. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like it a <br />high priority. Members agreed to make this high priority. <br />#25 Sketch Plan Process — Councilmember Maloney noted this was discussed recently <br />and he doesn't think we need further discussion. Councilmember Stolzmann stated this <br />is not a high priority Councilmember Loo would like to consider this. She stated we <br />have some large parcels and no conceptual idea of what could happen on them; having <br />a sketch plan/concept plan would be very useful. This would give someone an idea of <br />what might float for a property. Five members support postponing and two for <br />completion Remove from list for 2018 <br />#21 Review Permit Fees — Councilmember Stolzmann would like this done earlier than <br />Q3 as it affects budget. Zuccaro stated staff is looking at a consultant to help with this <br />so a budget amendment would allow this to happen earlier. Councilmember Stolzmann <br />stated this is really important and we should do the process internally and contract out <br />something else to allow for it <br />City Manager Balser stated there is an attraction to having a third party look at what we <br />are doing for fees. Zuccaro stated some of this is a time issue and it would require a <br />time commitment from multiple departments, but we feel it is better to bring in a third <br />party and be totally objective. Councilmember Stolzmann stated if we do this in-house <br />we have the opportunity to review and know our processes better <br />Members agreed to bring this to Council Q2 <br />#22 Historic Preservation Funding — Councilmember Loo asked why we need this one. <br />Director Zuccaro stated this is needed with the reapproval of the tax and also there is a <br />review of this required in the Historic Preservation Master Plan. Members decided to <br />leave as presented. <br />#16 Miners Cabins — Members agreed to change to one regular meeting. <br />ECONOMIC PROSPERITY <br />