My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2018 06 12
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2018 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2018 06 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
6/15/2018 10:13:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2018 06 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: DESIGN GUIDELINES UPDATE AND POLICY GUIDANCE <br />DATE: JUNE 12, 2018 <br />PAGE 9 OF 16 <br />Thus, Council could consider removing the SRU requirement for two to three story <br />buildings in the plan area or could also consider directing staff to identify areas that <br />could be considered to meet the SRU criteria and therefore those certain areas would <br />not require the SRU. <br />McCaslin Blvd. Small Area Plan <br />Under the 2013 Comprehensive Plan, the southern <br />in the Urban character zone, while the <br />northern portion was left undetermined <br />between Urban and Suburban. The Urban <br />character zone calls for smaller blocks, <br />more connected streets, and a more <br />pedestrian friendly environment, while the <br />Suburban character zone calls for more <br />auto -oriented development on larger blocks <br />with larger streets. The intersection of <br />McCaslin Blvd. and Dillon Rd. was <br />designated a Center development type, <br />with the Corridor development type to the <br />north. <br />portion of the McCaslin Blvd. area is <br />i3 Com{xehenl,.4 POan Framework tar MrCa}Gn , <br />The McCaslin SAP further breaks down the areas into Corridor, Center, and Edge <br />categories. Center development corresponds to the urban pattern and consists of small <br />parcels with limited landscaping. Buildings are oriented toward streets and sidewalks <br />with small, consistent setbacks. <br />Pedestrian and bike connectivity is <br />provided by street and sidewalk networks. <br />Corridor development corresponds to the <br />suburban pattern and consists of medium- <br />sized parcels with more formal <br />landscaping. Buildings are oriented toward <br />streets and parking lots with varying <br />setbacks. Pedestrian and bike connectivity <br />is provided by large sidewalks, on street <br />bike lanes, and hard surface trails. Edge <br />development corresponds to the rural <br />pattern and consists of large parcels with <br />natural landscaping. Buildings are <br />clustered with significant setbacks from <br />-CITY COUNT COMMUNICATION <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.