My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 06 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 06 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
6/20/2018 9:37:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 06 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 5, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />costs at the time they happened. He stated he supports the project but is concerned <br />about the process. <br />Councilmember Loo stated if contractors underbid projects the city should not be held <br />accountable. She would also like a line item detail of what each of these items cost. She <br />would like to postpone or continue the item until we have that detail. <br />Public Comments — None <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she is concerned about the process and asked <br />Perkins + Will if at any point in time did any staff member state or imply that additional <br />funds would be paid for these services. Chris Kastelic of Perkins + Will stated no one <br />stated or implied that. Councilmember Stolzmann stated some of these items seem <br />routine and others probably should have been added to the scope of work when they <br />were happening. She doesn't want contractors underbidding projects to get the contract <br />and then adding on costs at the end. <br />Kastelic stated they would provide a detailed list. He stated they probably have <br />approached this the wrong way. They were adapting and changing on the fly and didn't <br />keep a running tally, but should have done that. He agreed they should have been <br />asking for the changes along the way. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if Council does approve this do they anticipate additional <br />costs. Kastelic stated this request should cover costs through the completion of the job. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if they are anticipating additional change orders similar to <br />this with other contractors on the project. Martin stated Stevens can approve routine <br />change orders with Saunders for construction. In addition, there are still significant <br />contingency funds available on both the owner and the contractor side so we feel we <br />are in a good position financially. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if this could be continued to June 19 and have the vendor <br />bring back more detailed information for review. If that information seems reasonable it <br />will likely get approved. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the project has been well-managed and going well and these <br />costs do seem reasonable. He agreed itemization would be helpful. <br />Councilmember Leh stated without an itemized list he can't approve this. <br />Mayor Muckle moved to continue this item to the June 19th meeting. Mayor Pro Tem <br />Lipton seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she does not support this change and will vote <br />against the item when it comes back as she feels the work needs to be completed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.