My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2013 11 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2013 11 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/25/2018 10:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAPKT 2013 11 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 19, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />Staff asked if there is a specific direction the Board has on this. <br />Berry stated he feels if the structure can carry the load based on the level of decay. <br />Geise asked if decay had been changed also to "slight to moderate." <br />Staff replied it has changed also and the termite and decay factor could be a case by <br />case basis. Staff asked the Board and others present if they have run in to decay on <br />projects. <br />A yes reply was heard. <br />Staff asked if it was generally due to the wood in contact with earth or because a <br />non -decay species was used. <br />Johnson replied it is because a non -decay species has been used and has run into a <br />termite issue on a project, but it is rare to see termite damage and adds he normally <br />sees decay due to weather or moisture. <br />Staff stated the chart in the codes is more for newer construction. <br />Berry added the termite damage is normal with direct contact with earth and decay <br />has been with projects with direct contact with earth or near creeks and other areas <br />with constantly high ground water. <br />Van Pelt asked if Staff is looking to amend out the residential sprinkler code for new <br />single family homes. <br />Staff replied they are looking to not amend out the fire sprinkler codes as was done in <br />the last code adoption process. <br />Van Pelt asked about how tap fees would be figured out in regards to the current <br />municipal code. <br />Staff replied tap size is normally 3/4" for a single family residential. The IRC address <br />sprinkler taps two ways. One is it can split off and run the sprinklers separately. The <br />second is to not split from the domestic line and run the water supply system and the <br />sprinkler system. The homeowner can also run a separate tap for sprinkler only. A <br />separate tank can be installed and acts like a reservoir to run the sprinklers. <br />Mestas added the code requires two heads with a water supply for 10 minutes. FD <br />has seen the stand alone system with a separate tap with no fees from the City. The <br />separate reservoir tank can be filled by way of a garden hose or a separate line a <br />plumber can run which will only run if the water goes below a certain level. There is <br />also the shared system which runs all the water. <br />Staff added the requirement of the tank would only be required if in engineering, the <br />current water tap size couldn't support the pressure needed to maintain the 7 gallons <br />per minute of water for 10 minutes needed by code. <br />Geise stated there are pros and cons to adopting the sprinkler codes. The pros <br />being life safety, the time added to get people out and for the fire department to get <br />there and the cons being the added cost and the additional possibility of flooding in <br />the instance of tank or sprinkler head failure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.