My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Local Licensing Authority Minutes 2002 07 29
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY
>
2000-2019 Local Licensing Authority Agendas and Minutes
>
2002 Local Licensing Authority Agendas and Minutes
>
Local Licensing Authority Minutes 2002 07 29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
7/18/2003 2:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Signed Date
7/29/2002
Supplemental fields
Test
LAMIN 2002 07 29
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville Local Licensing Authority <br />Meeting Date: July 29, 2002 <br />.Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />happened, which is not unusual in this type of setting because of the varying <br />responsibilities of the bartenders. <br /> <br />Member Wilson inquired about where the burden of proof would fall if the <br />Authority went forward with action regarding this incident. Attorney Harrington <br />explained the Authority would hire a prosecutor to present the case with enough <br />evidence to show that an establishment is in violation. The licensee also has a <br />responsibility to show cause why their license should not be suspended or <br />revoked. Ultimately the responsibility lies with the City to produce enough <br />evidence that a violation occurred. <br /> <br />The Authority determined that there was not enough evidence to go forward with <br />a Show Cause,.Hearing. <br /> <br />Detective Lanphere noted that Druids Arms is continually, almost on a monthly <br />basis, having incidents. This may be something the Authority will have to <br />address in the future. He suggested providing.the establishment with more <br />training. <br /> <br />Member Kimmett suggested that Deputy Schmidt put together a compilation of <br />incident reports since the first of the year. Deputy Schmidt replied that she did <br />research any violations that had occurred in the past year that produced a Show <br />Cause Hearing. No further action was taken. <br /> <br />Member Wilson suggested that incident reports that only involve theft or are extremely <br />benign be moved to the consent agenda and if the Authority feels something merits <br />more discussion that an item can be removed from the consent agenda and placed on <br />the police department report agenda. Member Sackett inquired as to what would <br />constitute a minor incident. <br /> <br />Chairperson Lipton noted that the consent agenda is a routine action. Attorney <br />Harrington agreed and stated that police reports are listed under the police department <br />because there may or may not be action taken as a result of them. The Authority' <br />thought it would not save much more time if minor incident reports were moved to the <br />consent agenda. Member Kimmett also stated that making decisions regarding what <br />was appropriate for the consent agenda would be put on Deputy Schmidt and he was <br />not in favor of doing that. <br /> <br />SECRETARY'S REPORT <br /> <br />No Comments. <br /> <br />AUTHORITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br /> <br />No comments. <br /> <br /> 4 <br />F:\LIQUOR~2002\MINUTES\MINUTES JULY 02.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.