Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF LOUISVILLE <br /> BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> Minutes January 20,2000 <br /> Board Members Present: Greg Culhson <br /> Robert Spencer <br /> Ray Schlott <br /> Charles Keim <br /> Staff: Tom Talboom, Chief Buildmg <br /> Official <br /> Kathleen Kelly, City Attorney <br /> 1 Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7.00 p.m. <br /> 2. Roll Call: All Board members were present with the exception of Giles <br /> Schurman(excused)and Erik Hartronft(unexcused). <br /> 3 Discussion of Ordinance No. 1316 series 1999: <br /> Thomas Talboom—I have given the Board Members a copy of the ordmance. The format I used <br /> was a double strike through the provisions which are being changed. <br /> On page 4,number 3, sections 105 4 through 105 4 6 in the IPC deal with alternate engineering <br /> design methods. The attorney for the Plumbing Board sent a letter to the City Council which <br /> included a copy of the Plumbing Board minutes. One of the things that they adopted was <br /> appendix L,to the 1997 UPC. This addresses engineered systems and alternate materials and <br /> equipment not specifically covered under other parts of the Code. In light of this I think it is <br /> prudent for us to look at keeping the provisions for engineered systems. <br /> I have also included the State Plumbing Board decision on the PEX for water distribution <br /> systems. <br /> I think we should consider putting sections 105 4 through 105 46 back into our code adoption <br /> ordinance. <br /> The bottom line would be is if I don't feel comfortable approving an engineered system it would <br /> come before the Board as an appeal item. <br /> Chuck Keim—I don't usually see a lot of engineered designs. There would have to be a very <br /> good reason for it. This gives flexibility within the code. <br /> 1 <br />