Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 2, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 15 <br />• More information on long-term compensation assumptions including what is <br />included for salary surveys, market adjustments, and merit adjustments. <br />• What are the assumptions and what is the cost split is between employee and <br />employer for benefits. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the budget is sound, the issues that need to be <br />addressed are more policy decisions. He asked for information about: <br />• Paving appears to be underfunded; is there enough to meet our goals <br />• Would like more funding set aside for Transportation Master Plan (TMP) projects. <br />He would like a place holder in the budget for South Boulder Road projects. <br />• Would like information on the wage increases for 2021-2024. The long-term <br />costs will need to balance. <br />• Need to have policy discussions around the enterprise funds and capital costs for <br />recreation and golf. Regarding the golf course we need to review the water costs <br />and their effects on the fund. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the recreation/senior center budget is still a work in <br />progress and until we have all the analysis after it opens we shouldn't get too bogged <br />down on the recreation fund budget. We will need 6-9 months of information from the <br />new facility. The 2019 budget will be a temporary budget and will need changes for <br />2020. Councilmember Maloney agreed; we need real data from the new facility to see <br />how it affects the budget. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated Council does support funding the entryways but staff <br />has some concerns that we need more information about who owns each parcel and <br />who will maintain them long-term so we can do it properly. She agreed with the need to <br />look closer at the out year deficit numbers. Regarding the CIP, it seems some items are <br />really operational costs and that needs to be reviewed. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she disagrees on the Recreation Fund being a <br />temporary discussion; she would like to set the policies now. These are high level policy <br />discussions to have before the center opens so they are in place. We can amend them <br />if we need to. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the Recreation Fund includes athletic fields but that <br />should be under parks as that is how it is classified in the program budget. She stated <br />the Forestry Program needs to be reviewed for how it is meeting its KPIs. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann had the following items for followup: <br />• She is concerned we are not going to meet the paving goals and we seem to be <br />decreasing funding. <br />• She would like more money dedicated to TMP projects; what is there now is <br />insufficient to meet our needs. <br />• She would like discussion of high level goals for the Golf Course Fund. <br />