My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 10 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 10 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
10/17/2018 10:37:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 10 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 4, 2018 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />Fees are benchmarked against surrounding competing facilities. The Finance <br />Committee of the Recreation Advisory Board has reviewed these as has the Council <br />Finance Committee. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated these proposals are lower than the Greenplay report. We <br />are starting at a deficit. Our competition is going to be the YMCA and private facilities <br />that are much more expensive. He was not sure we are being aggressive enough. <br />Council members discussed whether the proposed fees should be higher and how to <br />make it equitable for tax payers as well as competitive. What rates would have to be <br />used to keep the subsidy down to an acceptable level and what higher rates might do to <br />membership. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked to see different scenarios with increases in rates as <br />well as comparisons to surrounding facilities. How sensitive are users going to be to <br />price increases. <br />Superintendent Martin noted the advisory board felt this was a reasonable rate increase <br />and the fees need to be continually evaluated instead of such long periods of time <br />between increases. Councilmember Maloney expressed caution concerning the context <br />and timeframe in which the advisory board looked at these numbers. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted this is the time for a larger increase. <br />Councilmember Keany stated we should be cautious about being too aggressive with <br />rate increases as that is part of how the sales tax was passed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated those who use it should pay more than those who don't. <br />From a competition perspective we need to be strategic and geographic, we want to get <br />the residents from Superior back. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the larger percentage increases are for resident rates, <br />which may be hard to justify to residents. Martin noted the non-resident rate has been <br />increased more often than residents. Those non-resident fee increases did not <br />significantly affect usage. <br />City Manager Balser noted staff will bring back a new proposal with different scenarios <br />and comparisons. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked for more on the philosophy of setting <br />these prices. <br />PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT <br />Director Kowar stated pavement is averaging $4.4M per year. Concrete averages about <br />40% of total cost. Kowar reviewed the various scenarios and proposed to stay at 4.4M. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.