Ordinance 2018-1763 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

adjacent to a common property line between adjoining residential properties, such that the facility minimizes visual impacts equitably among adjacent properties, unless landscaping, topography, other structures, or other considerations minimize visual impacts to a greater extent at a different location. 5. Not alter vehicular circulation or parking within the right-of-way or impede vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian access or visibility along the right-of- way or interfere with the Americans with Disabilities Act regulations. 6. No alternative tower structure may be located or maintained in a manner that causes unreasonable interference. Unreasonable interference means any use of the right-of-way that disrupts or interferes with its use by the City, the general public, or other person authorized to use or be present upon the right-of-way, when there exists an altemative that would result in less disruption or interference. Unreasonable interference includes any use of the right-of-way that disrupts vehicular or pedestrian traffic, any interference with public utilities, and any other activity that will present a hazard to public health, safety, or welfare. D. All ground based accessory equipment shall be installed in an underground vault, or above ground with nothing projecting more than 36 inches above grade, or collocated within a traffic cabinet, unless the applicant demonstrates that it is not feasible. Ground based accessory equipment located within a vision clearance area shall be no taller than 30 inches above grade. All above grade ground based accessory equipment shall be setback from trails and sidewalks a minimum of 2 feet. E. Any necessary wiring or cabling shall be located within the pole or, if not technically feasible, located within a fully enclosed sheathing attached to the pole. Such sheathing shall be the same color as the pole, shall be limited in size to that necessary to cover the wiring or cabling and may not extend out from the pole more than four inches. F. The City Manager may allow a reduction in the separation requirement or an increase in the maximum height requirement if the applicant demonstrates through technical network documentation that the requirement cannot result in a feasible network. The city may require that a city -retained technical consultant complete a study at the applicant's expense to evaluate the applicant's technical network documentation and provide an independent opinion regarding the impact on network feasibility. The request must also result in a facility that meets the following criteria: 1. The request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the facility is located, nor substantially or permanently impairs the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. 2. Approval of the request is warranted by the design incorporated in the proposal and the benefit provided to the city. Ordinance No. 1763, Series 2018 Page 11 of 18