Ordinance 2018-1763 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

b. The setback applicable to principal structures in the zoning district; or c. An alternative setback, approved by the City Manager, for alternative tower structures where the facility replaces or proposes an accessory structure to an established principal use, to include, but not limited to, signs, Tight poles, and flagpoles, where it is evidenced that the siting and location of the alternative tower structure allows for camouflage and concealment design techniques to a greater extent than would be achieved by application of the principal structure setback. iv. Freestanding and alternative tower structures are subject to the maximum building height for principal structures for the zoning district or applicable design standards, whichever is stricter, unless a waiver is obtained through the special review use procedures set forth in Sec. 17.42.070. 4. Ground based accessory equipment. All ground based accessory equipment that is associated with freestanding, alternative tower structures, roof -mounted or wall -mounted facilities are subject to the following requirements: i. Ground based accessory equipment shall be subject to the accessory structure setback requirements in the underlying zone district or the applicable design standards, whichever is stricter. ii. Ground based accessory equipment or buildings constructed for the primary purpose of containing accessory equipment shall not exceed twelve feet in height. iii. Ground based accessory equipment not fully enclosed in a building shall be fully screened with landscaping from adjacent residential property and public rights -of -way with a screen wall constructed of high -quality materials to be architecturally compatible with existing structures on the property and character of the neighborhood. iv. Buildings containing ground based accessory equipment shall be architecturally compatible with the existing structures on the property and character of the neighborhood. Sec. 17.42.070. Review procedures and requirements. A. No new wireless facility shall be constructed, and no collocation or modification to any wireless facility may occur except after a written request from an applicant, reviewed and approved by the City in accordance with this section. That review process varies according to the type and location of the proposed facility. The review process is intended to ensure that the facility will be designed and sited in a manner that complies with the provisions on this Chapter, and in such a way to minimize negative impacts on surrounding property. B. Eligible facilities requests submittal requirements and review Ordinance No. 1763, Series 2018 Page 14of18