My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 10 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 10 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
11/6/2018 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 10 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 16, 2018 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />Councilmember Maloney stated this should be either a park or Open Space — Other If it <br />is designated as park it would a great value to the community <br />Councilmember Keany agreed a park designation is appropriate He asked why the <br />change in interpretation on if a citizen vote is required He supports the park designation <br />if we can do that without a citizen vote <br />City Attorney Kelly stated the resident vote requirement is in the Charter but it is not in <br />effect until the parcel is zoned and this parcel has not yet been zoned <br />Councilmember Leh stated he supports a park designation if that is allowed He asked <br />again for confirmation that if it has not yet been zoned means we still have the flexibility <br />to make it a park. City Attorney Kelly stated the Charter clearly allows for parcel uses to <br />change if it has not yet been zoned as open space <br />Mayor Muckle stated this is a change in interpretation from what he recalls. He stated <br />he doesn't see a demand for more formal uses in Lake Park. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton suggested not making a decision tonight and rather wait until we <br />have the master plan for Cottonwood Park to see if it affects this. If we want to move <br />forward tonight he prefers a park designation. <br />Councilmember Loo agreed this is a change in interpretation to her She noted the <br />PPLAB looked at this but did so without knowing that a change in designation could be <br />done without a city-wide vote. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the value in the area is for wildlife and that exceeds the value of <br />being a park. He supports zoning as Open Space — Other designation <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated there is a gazebo and park like features on this <br />parcel and they need to be maintained at a higher level, but there is some community <br />desire for a park that is a bit more wild We need a balance that allows for some other <br />uses. <br />Mayor Muckle and Councilmember Leh supported a higher level of maintenance on this <br />property <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the Council does not have enough information to identify <br />maintenance levels now without cost information and details. <br />Members agreed to not move forward this property for zoning at this time Members will <br />discuss the maintenance standard for the area at a later date <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.