My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Minutes 2008 12 01
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2008 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Minutes 2008 12 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:41 PM
Creation date
2/4/2009 11:17:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADMIN 2008 12 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 1, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION -FEE IN LIEU OF PARKING FOR DOWNTOWN <br />McMillan gave an overview of the memo the he had prepared highlighting the range of <br />costs for parking based on land costs, structures, and other costs as well as the range of <br />fees that other municipalities charge. <br />Dalton stated that few other municipalities charge the actual cost of parking. If Louisville <br />does, we may look as though we are being punitive. <br />Wood stated that this is similar to tap fees. Other municipalities generally catch up to <br />those that are charging the actual amount. He added that those cities in a similar <br />position to Louisville are charging actual costs. <br />Michael Menaker, 1127 West Choke Cherry Drive, stated that at the current rate of <br />$3600 per space, the City is subsidizing the cost significantly. It would make more sense <br />to have a higher fee that could be lowered as an incentive for a good project. <br />McCartney stated that the market rate for a surface space would be $14,700 whether it <br />is paid by the developer or the City. So $14,700 may be the tipping point for a developer <br />of where or not to pay the City or find an alternative on site. <br />Ronda Grassi, 916 Main Street, stated that when the price was higher when originally <br />set it stifled development and there is concern that raising the price would do that again <br />and she doesn't want to jeopardize new development in downtown. <br />Dalton asked if the cost should be different for parking on the east side of the tracks. <br />Fleming stated it is critical to determine what the parking demand is, exactly how many <br />are needed and where, before proceeding. There needs to be clear justification for the <br />fee. <br />Dalton noted that one alternative is not to offer afee-in-lieu but just require development <br />to meet parking requirements on site. <br />Menaker noted that the City needs to push for shared parking that is appropriately <br />located for future uses. <br />Grassi stated that some developers will buy property to scrape for parking if it is cheaper <br />than the fee-in lieu. <br />Krueger reported that Arlin Lehman was unable to attend, but asked her to mention that <br />form a developer perspective the current price of $3600 is too low, but the first price of <br />$10,000 is too high as well. He feels that somewhere in the $6000 per space range is <br />reasonable. <br />Hogan noted that the City has never looked into metering parking for downtown. <br />Lathrop said that the City needs to be realistic in the fee and it should be very close to <br />the actual costs the City pays for creating spaces. Also, the City needs to know where <br />parking can be located and is needed so that the City doesn't let everything develop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.