My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 03 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 03 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
3/20/2019 2:54:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2019 03 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 5, 2019. <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />REGULAR BUSINESS <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION — MINER'S CABINS FINAL SITE SELECTION AND <br />PHASE THREE RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION SERVICES <br />Planner Selvoski stated this is a request for Council to make a final site selection on a <br />location for the Lee Avenue miner's cabins and direction regarding Phase III of the <br />contract for the relocation This has been a three phase project: moving from the original <br />location to the City Services site, choosing a final location, and relocation to a final <br />location and rehabilitated <br />Council directed staff to analyze two options 1 - moving both cabins to Miner's Field or 2 <br />- putting one at Highway 42 and Pine Street and one at Miners Field The consultants <br />have reviewed each site <br />Option 1 - both at Miners Field pros include co -location so the cabins maintain historical <br />relationship between the two structures, this is closest to the original location, this has <br />safer pedestrian access from Lee Avenue, this avoids the majority of utility conflicts, <br />avoids majority of drainage conflicts, is the less expensive option, and there is no <br />easement impact. The cons are the location requires the removal of two trees (subject to <br />change based on actual cabin placement) and more grading required to meet ADA <br />requirements and achieve positive drainage <br />Option 2 - one at Miners Field and one at Pine Street and Highway 42 pros include minor <br />grading required to achieve ADA compliance and positive drainage and it provides more <br />prominent visual access to the cabins. The cons are the location at Pine could be <br />impacted by future planned construction activities requiring re -doing work accomplished <br />during this phase, would cost approximately $25,000 to $30,000 more than Option 1, <br />loses context of cabin setting, there are potential easement conflicts, this is a busy <br />intersection that could negatively impact safe pedestrian access, there are utility pole guy <br />wire conflicts, there are more underground utilities and the cabin needs to be located 10 <br />feet from the sewer main which limits siting options. <br />The consultants recommend putting both at Miners Field <br />Additionally, staff seeks direction on who to use for the rehabilitation of the cabins. The <br />Council had asked staff to pause for a re-evaluation before the start of phase 3 Having <br />identified a final location for the cabins, issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) would <br />allow for the submittal of bids with accurate and updated price estimates. There is a <br />citizens group interested in participating in the process and potentially bidding for phase <br />three would allow that group to participate. The cost estimate would require going out for <br />a competitive bid to meet City purchasing policy rules. <br />Staff recommends locating both cabins at Miners Field and issuing an RFP for Phase 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.