My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 09 24
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 09 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:59 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 10:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 24 2019 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Mayor Muckle stated the Finance Committee recommends sticking with the <br />recommendation here for the 2020 budget and then going forward when there is more <br />information Changes can be addressed in the 2021-22 budget. <br />Director Watson noted the Golf Fund probably needs more work. Beginning in 2021, all of <br />the capital outlay for the golf course is proposed to be paid from the Capital Projects <br />Fund If Council wants golf course capital needs to compete with all other capital needs <br />this plan can stay If Council wants the golf course to have dedicated money for capital <br />improvements policy changes will be needed <br />Mayor Muckle stated the Finance Committee thinks this capital plan is needed as the golf <br />fund can't generate enough to pay for those capital needs They think it makes more <br />sense for the golf capital to compete with other capital projects rather than make a <br />transfer to the fund to pay for projects <br />City Manager Balser said there isa recognition we need to look at Tong -term capital <br />needs for the golf course and how we fund those <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she wants to clarify that she doesn't want an updated <br />fiscal model but rather a new one that staff can run more easily City Manager Balser <br />stated she is wary to assume we can simplify the model as she believes that would be <br />very difficult given the complexity of the model and the type of data people want from the <br />model <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would like a process that is less effort and can be <br />run easily by staff She would like a model that is repeatable and without a marginal cost <br />model She wants a more straightforward approach <br />Councilmember Loo stated $75K for this is a lot of money to hire a consultant. She would <br />prefer we don't change the fiscal impact model again, it takes too much staff time She is <br />not sure this is a priority <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she doesn't think we can continue to use this model <br />without it being better <br />City Manager Balser stated she is not sure it is realistic to assume we can make this <br />simpler given the expectations people have Director Zuccaro stated the issue with the <br />current model is that only staff can run it, so then people feel it is not transparent. <br />However, given the complex information people want to see this is the only way to <br />provide the information <br />City Manager Balser stated we have to have realistic expectations of what we can <br />achieve with an update or change to the model <br />City Manager Balser asked if Council has any changes to this recommended budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.