My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:59 PM
Creation date
10/16/2019 9:12:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 1, 2019 <br />Page4of9 <br />Director Zuccaro reviewed the current CIP funding available for the next four years for <br />TMP projects Staff would like feedback from council on top priorities for implementation <br />for the next two years <br />Director Zuccaro detailed some of the downtown connection enhancements that could be <br />done in connection with the 2020 paving of Pine Street This includes options for <br />intersection and sidewalk improvements <br />Public Comments <br />Aaron Clark, 957 Sunflower Street, stated this is a family oriented community and he <br />would like to see implantation of the Fun Routes to School to make Louisville unique This <br />has been done in other communities with little infrastructure and little cost and it would <br />give the kids something interesting and fun in getting to school This is a minor investment <br />that would set this community apart <br />Councilmember Loo stated it is an impressive piece of work She doesn't think this is an <br />auto -friendly document. She would have liked a statistically valid survey of residents <br />showing exactly what people like and don't like Many people don't like the current safety <br />improvements and find they are distracting She added that many people feel these ideas <br />will actually gum up traffic in town <br />Councilmember Leh stated he doesn't think the plan is unfriendly to auto transportation <br />but rather is not focused on that We are going to need to make changes in the next 10- <br />20 years and we will likely move away from automobiles It is good to think about being <br />bold in that area The problems with traffic are not going away and we need to address <br />that. He noted all of these projects require money and it will take some financial pain to <br />build them all and could require a bond issue <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the public engagement process for this was excellent <br />She stated she is prepared to vote on this tonight. She stated she has gotten a lot of <br />positive feedback on the Fun Routes to School and we should prioritize this For Pine <br />Street she supports the intersection improvements for next year For five-year priorities, <br />she stated people would like some significant work on underpasses She would like to poll <br />residents on how they want to see these funded <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the TMP is needed to inform the fiscal model and it will <br />help us frame transportation and capital planning He also is prepared to support this <br />tonight He stated the discussion of priorities should be later He likes the Great Streets <br />program and likes that the Plan is informative but not prescriptive He also likes the Fun <br />Routes to school He agrees the only way to fund these is probably an initiative The <br />current budget won't pay for much of what we want Pine Street should be updated and <br />used to set the stage for Great Streets There are a lot of crossing and underpasses, but <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.