My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2009 01 12 Joint Meeting
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2009 01 12 Joint Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 3:10:22 PM
Creation date
2/27/2009 8:47:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Also Known As (aka)
Planning Commission and Revitalizatin Commission Joint Meeting
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/12/2009
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C1
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2009 01 12 SP JOINT WITH PLANNING COMM
Document Relationships
Planning Commission Agenda 2009 01 12 SP
(Cross-References)
Path:
\BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)\PLANNING COMMISSION\2000-2019 Planning Commission\2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
Revitalization Commission Agenda 2009 01 12 SP Joint Meeting
(Cross-References)
Path:
\BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)\REVITALIZATION COMMISSION\2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets\2009 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Highway 42 Market, Feasibility, and Financing Study <br />Final Report <br />December 11, 2008 <br />3. There is significant market potential for residential development within a two <br />mile radius of the Highway 42 revitalization area. The market is maturing and <br />diversifying, given the range of attached and detached products included in active <br />development. <br />There are 535 attached units in the pipeline within the immediate vicinity of the <br />Highway 42 area with another 773 units in Broomfield, including projects within town <br />center developments. The voh~me of attached development in the pipeline suggests the <br />market will support the type of higher density development anticipated for the <br />Highway 42 corridor. The overall Louisville market is strong, given appreciation rates <br />of resale product located in the vicinity of downtown. The growing volume of sales and <br />8.3 percent annual average price increases have outpaced other submarkets in the metro <br />area. As the current inventory of attached product is absorbed over time and as <br />amenities are established to create a sense of place within the Highway 42 <br />redevelopment area, prices are expected to increase to make development feasible. <br />The planned RTD transit st,atio:n has been viewed by the development community as a <br />catalyzing force that will increasee demand for uses in the study area. However, even <br />without the introduction of transit service, the market for residential development is <br />reasonably strong. Once actives projects north of South Boulder Road as well as those in <br />the vicinity of 96th Street and Tape Drive near buildout (estimated at six to ten years), <br />developers should be able to transfer the market momentum to sites within the study <br />area. This assumes that the City is able to establish connectivity to downtown, provide <br />some civic amenity, and address issues related to the current industrial character. <br />4. For most uses within the study area, specifically mixed-use and residential <br />development, the market must mature and yield higher rental and sales prices for <br />projects to achieve feasibility. A feasibility model (provided as Appendix A) was <br />developed to test a range of different uses and assumptions, summarized below. <br />Generally, local market conditions must mature before most development options <br />become feasible. One of thE~ uses with potential to achieve the necessary rent thresholds <br />sooner than other is conventional commercial development, assuming a rent threshold <br />of $22 per square foot, capiitali2:ation rate of 7.5 percent, and an FAR of .25 that allows for <br />surface parking. <br />The model shows that the minimum feasibility threshold for residential use requires <br />minimum sales points of $2'85 per square foot, which is higher than current project in the <br />vicinity but is consistent with prices achieved on a limited number of downtown sales. <br />This threshold is reasonable to expect in the future, to the extent amenities similar to <br />downtown can be created i:n the study area. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.