Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 25, 2019 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Water coming from South Boulder Creek is distributed to other water sheds as well as <br />Coal Creek which we use. If we buy agricultural water and want to change it to a <br />municipal use that must be approved by the Water Court and we must keep flows up in <br />the other water sheds as well. Currently, there is no infrastructure in place for water from <br />our basin to get to the other basins so there is less of a guarantee we can transfer water <br />uses via water decree. To assure we can get water we will need to build a pipeline but it <br />may not be possible. Therefore even if FRICO purchases are cheaper we may not be <br />able to use it if we can't get Water Court approval. <br />Director Kowar reviewed the Colorado Big Thompson/Windy Gap (CBT/WG) system. The <br />only constraint on these purchases is our own pipeline from the pump station in North <br />End to our north water plant. There are plans to resolve that pipeline issue. <br />Windy Gap is a great supplemental water supply. In a wet year it produces a lot of water, <br />however we don't need water in a wet year. CBT/WG users need to build Chimney Hollow <br />reservoir to store the excess WG water in wet years. Chimney Hollow is estimated to be <br />on line in the mid-2020s. He noted CBT/WG water is more expensive than FRICO as it is <br />pumped from the Western Slope. <br />Director Kowar reviewed the water acquisition considerations including delivery cost, <br />acquisition costs, water court risk, return flow requirements, and other issues. He noted <br />for long-term resales CBT is the better value. Keeping firm yields in both basins helps <br />maintain our redundancy and a firm flow rate. <br />Director Kowar reviewed the amount of water we have, what we think we need, what the <br />risks/threats are, and what is constraining our ability to use water we have. He reviewed <br />the history of the City's efforts to purchase water starting with the 1979 plan. We currently <br />use the estimate of 7120 acre feet as our annual goal. He reviewed the historical <br />consumption of water by residential, commercial, and other uses. Water usage is going <br />down even as population goes up, however much of that is weather dependent. <br />Director Kowar noted City departments are charged for their water use; so other City <br />funds pay into the Water Fund for use. Director Watson also noted the Water Fund is an <br />enterprise fund so it must pay for itself. The Water Fund income can only come from the <br />service it provides; this is why we haven't used water fees as a way to give incentives for <br />new businesses. Also, TABOR states any subsidy of over 10 percent coming from <br />another fund means the loss of TABOR status. Loss of that status would mean we cannot <br />bond water funds without a vote of the people. <br />Director Kowar noted the 2016 Raw Water Master Plan included 6700 acre feet as the <br />recommended goal for firm yield. That is the firm yield goal staff works with today. He <br />added the goal is meant to cover all possibilities and growth. That goal is for best <br />practices for the long term. <br />