Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />November 13, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />10. Discussion Item: Social Trails on Open Space. Presented by David Blankenship, <br />OSAB Member (see pages 10-12 of the November 2019 OSAB Meeting packet) <br />David introduced the topic and reviewed the summary in the packet. Peter suggested <br />using the term "unimproved" instead of "single-track". Fiona and Helen suggested "dirt". <br />Mike asked Ember about the implications of "dirt trails" regarding ADA accessibility. <br />Ember noted that the City tries to make trails ADA-compliant where possible; our trails <br />are generally assessed as being useable for wheelchairs, including the crusher fines <br />trails. <br />Fiona asked if dirt trails would be open to bikes; David said his thinking was not, due to <br />narrow width. Fiona noted that if an existing social trail serves a clear bicyclist need, it <br />should be developed and widened as a true bicycle -serving trail. <br />Mike suggested that an inventory is a good starting point; this will help us determine <br />which trails should be closed, which "adopted" as -is, and which should be developed as <br />crusher fines or pavement. He noted that it's a lot of work to do this inventory. Fiona <br />noted that closures have budget implications as well due to staff time and materials to <br />perform and enforce the closure. <br />David noted that many social trails are short-cuts, and these might be the easiest to <br />close, if so decided. Nathan suggested prioritizing social trails that serve the overall <br />network best. <br />Mike suggested having an overall plan for designation or closure in the context of the <br />entire trail system, and that it be carried out in a systematic way. Mike suggested that <br />OSAB members could provide input to staff re: trails to designate as "dirt" and trails to <br />designate for closure, and that staff can review and plan accordingly. Ember noted that <br />there may be legal implications for maintenance if the trails are "official" and on the trail <br />system maps. She noted that Louisville does not have a definition for this new type of <br />trail, and this concept would need to be formalized. Fiona suggested selecting a few <br />obviously resource -damaging short-cuts for OS staff to try to close, as this could be <br />performed without amending trail definitions (such as the switchback "cutting" on North <br />Open Space). <br />Nathan and Ember agreed to work with staff to discuss a "pilot project" for closing a few <br />of these trails. OSAB members can email Nathan and Ember with suggestions for <br />possible "closure" candidates. <br />11. Discussions Items for the Next Meeting on Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2019 <br />A. Finalize OSAB 2019 Goals & Objectives <br />B. Trail updates: Hecla to Waneka; Lake to Lake <br />C. Dutch Creek/Elephant Park Design and Potential Impacts to Open Space (Allan <br />Gill/Nathan Mosley) <br />D. Board recommendations for OSAB 2020 Goals <br />E. DOLA memo: review/discuss <br />F. Nawatny Ridge: Planning Dept. & Applicant <br />G. Updated MOST Priorities and Goals document: discussion <br />12. Adjourn <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:25 pm. <br />5 5 <br />