My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2020 02 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2020 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2020 02 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:16 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 2:58:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/18/2020
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 18, 2020 <br />Page 13 of 18 <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated removing this language makes it clear the intent is not to <br />include a neighborhood. She noted a future Council could approve a service plan <br />change to allow for adding additional areas. Attorney Kelly stated the service plan has <br />limitations on inclusion and exclusion powers under state law. As written, any addition <br />of property would require City approval as well as written approval from property <br />owners. <br />Councilmember Lipton asked how a service plan amendment would happen. City <br />Attorney Kelly stated the same process for this initial approval would be used. <br />(d) The area to be included in the proposed special district has, or will have, the financial <br />ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis. <br />Mayor Stolzmann asked Jim Manire, the City's financial consultant, if he had <br />evaluated whether or not the development timeline was reasonable and if there was <br />market support for what is proposed. Manire stated his review does not include a <br />market study but rather evaluates the consistency of the debt plan with respect to the <br />projections provided. <br />Mayor Stolzmann asked if all of the districts are equally loaded or is one district more <br />important to pay the debt. He stated the financing plan should be viewed as a possible <br />execution of a debt plan but not the final plan. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated looking at the distribution of development across the districts <br />it seems 2 and 3 have good plans but 4 has a lot yet to be determined with the <br />majority of the debt coming from that district. The way she reads it there is not <br />sufficient evidence the debt can be repaid when the majority is in this one district and <br />there is no market study to support the numbers. <br />Councilmember Brown asked Manire if his analysis takes the applicant's information <br />at face value and assesses if the numbers presented will work. Manire stated yes, he <br />is working with the numbers presented by the developer. <br />Councilmember Brown asked the City Attorney if it is correct that in the end the <br />financial plans may or may not be executed as presented here. City Attorney Kelly <br />stated that is correct. <br />Councilmember Lipton stated he has never seen a market study l000king out more <br />than five years that ended up exactly as presented. This will probably develop <br />differently than any market study given today. That is the normal process. <br />Councilmember Lipton asked what is the risk to the City if the market changes and it <br />doesn't develop as proposed. Attorney Kelly stated from a legal standpoint any debt <br />taken on by the District is not associated with the City and does not put the City at risk. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.