My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2020 02 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2020 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2020 02 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:16 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 2:58:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/18/2020
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 18, 2020 <br />Page 8 of 18 <br />supportable and that the Districts can provide services as required under the State <br />Statutes. He noted Council can approve, disapprove, or continue this item tonight. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney noted this approval is being sought prior to the comp plan and <br />plat. He asked what the downside is doing it this way. Director Zuccaro stated the plan <br />itself needs to clarify needs and costs. This is why staff included a requirement that the <br />applicant formally amend the service plan and get Council sign off after those approvals. <br />This will make sure the financial information concurs with final development plans. <br />Councilmember Lipton asked which entity would have responsibility for the various <br />improvements. Director Zuccaro stated infrastructure would be turned over to the City but <br />the Districts would provide ongoing maintenance for medians and funding TDM costs. <br />Councilmember Lipton asked where in the process this will be determined. Director <br />Zuccaro stated the final plat will identify this in a subdivision improvement agreement. <br />Applicant Presentation Jeff Baukol, Brue Baukol Partners, gave background about their <br />company and their experience with metro districts. He stated the need for the District is to <br />cover the improvements on the large site which are estimated to be over $178 million. He <br />noted all taxes from the District must be spent on public improvements in the District. He <br />noted the request for the District is coming now to allow for a May election. <br />He noted these considerations 1) as proposed, there will be no individual homeowners in <br />the District to be taxed; 2) the Inclusion Area is set to the existing ConocoPhillips property <br />boundary; and 3) the largest tenants account for 38% of the land and they are aware of <br />the District's financial responsibilities; this assures the new growth is paid by those in the <br />District. There is no tax burden to anyone outside the District. <br />Baukol stated only taxpayers within the Districts are subject to District debt and there is <br />no tax burden on residents and businesses outside of the District. He stated each district <br />will have its own board but will coordinate the installation of public improvements. <br />Baukol reviewed the accountability limits on the District's powers and the financial <br />organization. He noted no debt can be issued until the GDP is approved. If the GDP is not <br />approved, the Districts are dissolved. He added all construction must comply with City <br />standards and meet competitive bidding laws. <br />He noted the rules around accountability and transparency for the Districts including <br />public meeting and reporting requirements. <br />Baukol added the mill levy rates are in line with those of neighboring metro districts. <br />Public Comments <br />David Sinkey, 712 Main Street, stated these districts are complex but they are not evil. All <br />people investing in to the District will know what they are getting into. He added <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.