My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 8:58:54 AM
Creation date
5/15/2020 10:58:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/11/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 24th, 2020 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br /> <br />Klemme asked for information on the period of significance. <br /> <br />Selvoski replied that the Master Plan and Council had determined the period of <br />significance as ending in 1955, since the last mine closed that year. <br /> <br />Haley added that nationally there was no period of significance date. The landmarking <br />program was tied to the 50-year mark. She explained that City Council had pushed to <br />have a hard date for the demolition review process. <br /> <br />Ulm thought it was a great example of what was going on in Louisville at the time and <br />that it was important to the city. The one-car garage was a great example of the <br />beginning of the age of the automobile. The structure also related to the historic <br />elements of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Haley added that there was a continuity on the street with other houses. <br /> <br />Haley asked for applicant comment. <br /> <br />Selvoski replied that the applicant had had to leave. <br /> <br />Haley asked if Planner Selvoski knew the applicants’ motivations for landmarking. <br /> <br />Selvoski replied that she did not know but, as far as she knew, there were no plans to <br />make any additions. <br /> <br />Haley wondered if Bridget Bacon could do a neighborhood context to study social <br />significance. Haley observed that this period and after was a hard preservation sell for <br />people and having more information could help with future discussions. <br /> <br />Dunlap stated that some of mountain towns were preserving more recent structures like <br />A-Frames in addition to their mining districts. <br /> <br />Parris noted that Louisville has evolved and changed and this was part of the story. Part <br />of the controversy with the mid-modern homes was that they were not always the really <br />cool structures, but she thought that the structure met the criteria and helped the City <br />tell its story. <br /> <br />Klemme moved to find probable cause. Parris seconded. Passed unanimously by voice <br />vote. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION <br /> <br />Historic Structure Assessment Presentations: 1000 Main Street, 701 Pine Street, <br />1016 Grant Avenue, and 908 Rex Avenue <br />Andy Johnson DAJ Design, 922A Main Street, noted that a number of the homes <br />around 1301 Jefferson were built by Denver craftsman and you can tell by the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.