My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2017 01 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2017 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2017 01 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:29:48 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:46:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/12/2017
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 12, 2017 <br />Page 9 of 29 <br />Anything being proposed should not impact the open space and open for recreation, as well as <br />serving its drainage function. <br />Sheets says this building should have approximately 480 spaces based on the 120,000 SF. <br />There are 325 spaces to be provided and 26 spaces extra from other building. We are still <br />lacking 129 spaces. <br />Zuccaro says cities struggle with this balance. What is the right ratio and still have flexibility <br />when it warrants? You don't want spillover into neighborhoods or public streets. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Todd Twombly, Tritower Investment Group, TGF Coal Creek Property, LLC, 60 State Street, <br />22nd Floor, Boston, MA 02109 <br />We acquired these assets in October 2015. Medtronic occupies 116,000 SF across two <br />buildings. We own three buildings but not Premier Credit Union and Residence Inn Louisville. <br />Medtronic is our largest tenant in these three buildings and is the second largest employer in <br />Louisville. They have been here for 15 years and are entrenched in the community. When we <br />bought the building, Medtronic had three years left on their lease. They now have 18 months <br />left. We want to keep Medtronic in our buildings in Louisville. If they do not have the ability to <br />expand, they may leave Louisville. Currently, this is home to their surgical GPS navigation <br />devices and an imaging center. They build O-arms that take a map of the body. They do testing <br />and training on these surgical devices. In surgery, doctors use them and are guided by GPS. <br />These buildings are not typical, dense -packed call centers such as Verizon. 60% of the space is <br />typical cubicles and hard -walled offices. The rest is mock operation suites similar to those seen <br />at a hospital. They fly doctors in from around the world to train them on using the devices. The <br />other primary use is as a support center. Every surgical tool and device in practice in the field <br />has its own support center. We are asking for these waivers so we can ask Medtronic to commit <br />long term to these buildings and to Louisville. To answer your question about future uses, the <br />reality is companies who require high parking totals will not look at these buildings. <br />Joseph Leer, Davis Partnership Architects, 2901 Blake Street, Suite 100, Denver, CO 80205 <br />Regarding the open space density waiver requested, in the business park PUD, there is <br />transferability of density. Of the three parcels that Tritower owns, there is surplus open space or <br />lack of density on Lot 5 of 6%, and Lots 2 and 6 of about 2%. If we can transfer that density <br />overall, we do meet the density of 70% maximum and open space of 30% minimum for the <br />entire PUD. This is not the case for the individual lot itself, but we think this is a reasonable <br />request, considering that Parcel B is dedicated to 100% open space. Regarding parking, the <br />BRT station is under'/2 mile from our site. There are two bike trails that are adjacent to the site. <br />There are alternative transportation opportunities which add to the site. Overall, neighboring <br />municipalities work to reduce parking requirements and we see it as a general movement <br />throughout the industry. We've seen it in our development partners who are accepting lower <br />parking ratios. As we become denser and more aware of sustainability and alternative <br />transportation, it has become more favorable. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is a <br />national standard that traffic analysis engineers use as a baseline. Their average for parking for <br />a building of this size is 343 spaces. We think this is why this is a reasonable request for parking <br />reduction. For the total development with three parcels through the shared parking agreement, <br />there is a surplus currently of 26 spaces. This is not part of the 2.7 spaces/1000 SF count. <br />Regarding the setback waivers for parking along the conservation easement and Parcel B, the <br />distance from the edge of Highway 36 to the property line is approximately 150'. From the <br />neighboring property, it is 40'-50' to their property line, and they have an additional 40' before <br />their parking starts. Because the Highway 36 ROW widens at this point, we think it is a <br />reasonable request to reduce the 40' setback down to 10', particularly in consideration that it is <br />a small section of the property line. This will also be the 8 parking spaces dedicated to public <br />parking for trail access. There is enhanced trail access to the east of the site. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.