My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 10 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2020 4:12:01 PM
Creation date
10/19/2020 12:07:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/19/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
strong ties to the Louisville mining <br />industry. <br />Integrity <br />This structure adds character and <br />value to Old Town Louisville and <br />represents a pattern of growth typical <br />of the post-war years in Louisville. <br />The structure retains its overall form <br />and appearance from the street and <br />exhibits a high level of physical <br />integrity. The house remains it its <br />original location and has not been <br />moved. <br />2. The relationship of the building as a <br />No <br />The house is not located in any <br />potential contributing structure to a <br />potential historic districts. <br />potential historical district per the <br />criteria set forth in this chapter, <br />3. The reasonable condition of the <br />Unknown <br />The applicant did not provide any <br />building*, and <br />documentation regarding the condition <br />of the property. <br />4. The reasonable projected cost of <br />Unknown <br />The applicant did not provide any cost <br />restoration or repair.* <br />estimates for restoration or repair. <br />* In considering the condition of the building and the projected cost of restoration or repair as set <br />forth in subsections H.3 and H.4, above, the commission may not consider deterioration caused <br />by unreasonable neglect. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />LMC Sec. 15.36.200 notes that the purpose of demolition review is to: <br />1. Prevent loss of buildings that may have historic and architectural significance; and <br />2. Provide the time necessary to initiate designation as an individual landmark or to <br />consider alternatives for the building. <br />Staff finds that the property could meet the criteria for architectural significance, integrity and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.