City Council Minutes 1997 06 03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Peterson stated that it had been their policy since 1977. He stated that teacher ratio is 7:1. Keany was concerned that the placement of this school in a commercial area will affect future development of restaurants serving alcohol that would be coming into the McCaslin corridor there. Susan Ca/friths, City Attomey, stated that the City has flexibility with respect to the issuance of Hotel & Restaurant Liquor Licenses in the future, if it chooses to use that flexibility. Sisk wanted to make sure this would not cause a problem for the school or future potential land users. He suggested a continuance of this resolution. Lathrop asked that all tenants of the building be notified of the applicant's intent and the meetings. Levihn was concerned about the parking. Howard also wanted anyone whose liquor license may be affected to be notified. Howard moved that Council continue Resolution No. 26, Series 1997, until June 17, 1997, seconded by Lathrop. All in favor with Davidson being absent. Sisk asked the applicant to have the landlord/owner or a representative present at that meeting. DISCUSSION/DIRECTION PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PUD - COAL CREEK MEDICAL CAMPUS -LOT 2 LOUISVILLE CAMPUS SUBDIVISION Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the request was to plat the 2.5 acres from one lot to four development lots and an Outlot A. Outlot A would function as a drive access, emergency access and a parking area regulated by a joint access easement and a maintenance agreement. This would also benefit Lot 1 to the south. Lot sizes were proposed between 7,300 s.f. and 19,000 s.f. The PUD Development Plan had been submitted for a 4,800 s.f. two-story medical office building on proposed Lot 1. There would be a total of approximately 24,000 s.f. of professional and medical offices for the four proposed lots. Sisk called for the applicant's presentation. William Finberg, 303 East 17th Avenue, Suite 920, Denver, CO 80203, introduced Marty Murphy with the architectural firm of Murphy Stevens. He explained that this project was motivated by Dr. Scott Replogle (plastic surgeon) wanting to expand his practice. It was anticipated that the other lots will each have a different owner. The development will eventually be comprised of three or four small medical type buildings. They planned to increase the landscaping from the preliminary drawing. They felt the parking was adequate. They had met with the School District and had incorporated all of their requests and suggestions. They do have their approval. 5