Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2021 08 18

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes January 20, 2021 Page 5 of 6 Stewart describes more in depth why the applicant is asking for this particular size and shape. The 18 ft depth is based on the existing deck. Making the proposed structure smaller would mean changing the existing structure. That is why we are proposing this shape. The applicant would like this covered because there is a strong afternoon sun and the afternoon is the most common time they would like to be on their deck. Board Questions of Applicant: Nakari asks that on the letters of approval, are those the immediate adjacent neighbors? Stewart says that they are the directly adjacent neighbors. Public Comment None heard. Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: None heard. Discussion by Board: Stuart says that the staff report was very convincing. He is comfortable with the staff's conclusion that this application should be approved. Mihaly says he agrees with Board Member Stuart. It was a great report from the staff and was also very convincing. Nakari says he agrees with staff's report. His only concern would have been if the neighbors were not in support, but they were so he has no issues approving this application. Hawksley reiterates that this application is a good proposal. Cooper says this is a good proposal and appreciates that the homeowner is not adding any additional space. She approves this application and thinks it will work great for the homeowner and the City. Motion is made by Stuart to approve 1723 Madison Court's request for a variance from the Residential Low Density (RL) minimum rear setback of twenty-five feet to allow a rear setback of twelve feet and ten inches for a covered deck. Motion is seconded by Nakari. Roll call vote. Name Vote Karen Cooper Yes James Stuart Yes Jonathan Mihaly Yes Matt Nakari Yes