My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2020 01 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2020 01 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2021 2:45:15 PM
Creation date
10/19/2021 7:44:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/13/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
10/19/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13th, 2020 <br />Page6of9 <br />Klemme stated that she thought the Old Town Overlay served the same purpose as a <br />Historic District, except that the Overlay was a voluntary and incentive -based program. <br />She thought they were otherwise the same thing. <br />Selvoski replied that there could be dramatic changes if the City moved away from a <br />voluntary program, but there could be conversations about those issues in the future. <br />Dunlap asked about addressing design guidelines. <br />Selvoski replied that the Old Town Overlay was going to be in review, which would <br />address design guidelines and change zoning. <br />Klemme asked how that would work with the Planning Commission. <br />Selvoski replied that almost everything on the Planning Commission was based on <br />numbers, whereas Preservation could consider intent. Design guidelines dealt more in <br />measurables like percentages. <br />Dunlap stated that guidelines were not requirements. <br />Selvoski replied that generally the guidelines needed to be followed. <br />Klemme stated that the order of projects for 2020 were appropriate and that some of the <br />projects went together. She suggested holding preservation training for city residents. <br />She asked if there was a flyer for the public about the program's incentives. <br />Selvoski replied that staff had drafts of flyers. <br />Klemme suggested hosting an event at the library instead of relying on mailings, one <br />about dos -and -don't about preservation and one about explaining the City's program. <br />Selvoski replied that she had been having conversations with the Sustainability Board <br />and there might be a logical connection with the sustainability side of historic <br />preservation. <br />Dunlap agreed that sustainability could complement or conflict preservation. <br />Haley asked for public comment. <br />Andy Johnson, DAJ Design 922A Main Street, noted that he thought the preservation <br />training should be open to the public. He suggested that design professionals, builders, <br />and other stakeholders should receive the training alongside everyone else. He also <br />suggested a careful review of HSA requirements, which were currently similar to the <br />Department of the Interior requirements, and therefore might require recalibration. He <br />also asked for feedback on the quality of completed HSAs in helping the Commission to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.