My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1997 04 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1997 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1997 04 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:42 PM
Creation date
4/7/2004 11:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/1/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1997 04 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lathrop commented that once a standard had been established, it becomes the standard. It has to be <br />a very, very good reason to waiver from that. The burden is solely placed upon the applicant to <br />demonstrate the reason to waiver from that. <br /> <br />Howard asked Koelbel about the exterior site lighting and the 24' pole height being unacceptable. <br /> <br />Koelbel stated that at Eagle Hardware they have 30' poles because to get a certain level of foot candle <br />that is needed for certain requirements in the parking lot, there is a disproportionate amount of <br />increase in the amount of standards you need, if you go 24' vs. 30'. It is an expense and an esthetic <br />issue. <br /> <br />Howard asked Koelbel about the parking lot orientation. <br /> <br />Koelbel stated that there are certain planning issues and requirements of large users that demand more <br />than that. They have to have a certain number of parking stalls within a certain radius of the front <br />door. Requiring 25% to go around the side, they may never achieve that requirement. If their <br />requirement is not met, there is a good chance you will lose them. <br /> <br />Howard asked Martin how Council could reconcile her commercial needs with some of their safety <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Martin stated that at the last Planning Commission meeting the site was accepted with exception to <br />the drive-thru with four issues. None of those said absolutely that a drive-thru could not be placed <br />so that it was between the building and McCaslin Boulevard. The issues had to do with pedestrian <br />crossing, pedestrian gathering areas, the stacking for the drive-thru, and the viability of the drive-thru. <br />She pointed out that this document says that there will be no drive-thru placed between a public street <br />and an establishment, which eliminates this drive-thru totally. <br /> <br />Mayer felt the document would do what the citizens want to be done, maintaining high standards for <br />Louisville. He was told by one of the Broomfield City Council members that a number of businesses <br />coming to Interlocken could not meet their standards, which are higher than Centennial Valleys. He <br />said they just send them down to Louisville. He did not want Louisville viewed as a place that will <br />accept lesser quality development than the surrounding areas. He was convinced that Jay Keany, <br />Kevin Howard, Bill Boulet, and Bill Simmons represented the City fairly in this and the guidelines <br />represent a modest attempt at keeping high quality development in Louisville without an unreasonable <br />burden on the property owner. <br /> <br />Sisk asked the City Attorney's opinion on Koelbel feeling they would come under the Gateway <br />Design Guidelines. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that their opinion is that Centennial Valley is not exempt <br />entirely from the proposed guidelines, rather the Gateway Guidelines include provisions which would <br />cause other ordinances of the City to apply to Centennial Valley. Consequently, she did not feel they <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.