Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />April 13, 2022 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Deb asked if fire considerations are now part of all building standards. Ember answered that <br />they are working with Planning on standards, but current direction is to "re -build to existing". <br />There will be more debris removal events as needed. Davidson Mesa was opened on <br />March 251", and trail re -construction work there is beginning. There will be some sections where <br />they re -design drainage. Staff are also working with an engineering firm called OTACK to do <br />some project management for these projects, since staff is so busy. Deb asked if Boulder <br />County was helping with Davidson Mesa work. Ember said that this would disqualify them from <br />FEMA support. She said that the County is replacing some of its agricultural fencing (barbed <br />wire). <br />Staff are also working hard on FEMA tracking and documentation. Ember said they <br />were able to use knowledge and expertise they gained after the 2013 flood. <br />Staff will monitor the fire's impact on native vegetation. She called the board's attention <br />to Steve Roel's memo in the packet. <br />There was an herbicide treatment on the CSU cheatgrass study done in March. They <br />are going to see how the plants respond to the fire and herbicide treatments. They are <br />anticipating knapweed and mullein to respond vigorously to the fire. Ember cautioned that a lot <br />of this work would be wait -and -see. Jessamine thought the public might be interested in Steve's <br />memo, especially as it explains why Davidson Mesa might be slower to green up than smooth <br />brome-dominated sites. Susan and Helen agreed. Ember thought that was helpful feedback. <br />They are trying to be sensitive about word choice and public outreach. David suggested <br />sharing some fire response ecology at the volunteer clean up events. Ember said they had a <br />script for the staff to use on this topic, but were leaving it to the comfort -level of staff. <br />Jessamine suggested the board would like to see those scripts, as they would be useful for <br />board members when they get approached by citizens about these issues. <br />10. Discussion Item: OSAB Recommendations for 2023-2024 Operational Budget & <br />Staffing Adjustments. Presented by Ember Brignull, Acting Deputy Director for Parks <br />and Open Space and David Blankinship, OSAB Chair. <br />Ember presented the five subprograms of the Operational Budget. She asked the board <br />to recommend things that OSAB sees as important to change. <br />Maintenance and Management (the biggest pool of money). Helen commented that the <br />proposed project manager position might be very useful and Peter and Jessamine agreed. <br />Ember asked if they thought it should be a division -level position or just departmental. Peter <br />thought it was needed, though he didn't know whether it needed to be dedicated to open space. <br />Ember said that currently the division has a single project manager for the golf course, parks, <br />and open space. David said that Redtail Ridge, if it passes, would place a large demand on this <br />position. He added that there are a lot of great ideas in documents like the Transportation <br />Master Plan, but he's afraid these plans don't get executed on. David added that many citizen <br />complaints have to do with maintenance issues, which suggests that the Maintenance Specialist <br />position is needed too. Other board members agreed. Helen commented that the challenge <br />has been to retain staff. She asked Deb whether the city is looking into ways to improve pay or <br />benefits to retain workers. Deb and Ember said they were looking for ways to improve both pay <br />and advancement. Ember asked the board how they felt about the operational part of this <br />document. The board thought it was fine as it was, though suggested it was hard to anticipate <br />some of these needs after the fire. <br />