Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2022 08 10

Home Browse Search

Open Space Advisory Board Minutes July 13, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Jessamine felt that it would be wrong to use the broader open space tax fund for this project without a larger discussion, but if there was funding available in the larger pipeline project, then she would be in favor of doing it now. Laura summarized that she thought she was hearing consensus that the board would like staff to look into the project and the budget, but didn't want to be pressured into it. Ember pointed out that Hecla Lake trails are slated for resurfacing this fall, and that there might be a chance for this project at that time. Charles thought this could be a good impetus to re -energize the trails tiger team. Helen suggested the tiger team could focus on Hecla too, not just Warembourg. 9. Discussion Item: Opportunities to Improve Open Space and Trails Acquisition Ranking Process. Presented by Jessamine Fitzpatrick, OSAB Member. Jessamine stated that this discussion item is in preparation for the board's land acquisition process scheduled for summer, 2023. Ember gave some context for this process and said that the main goals are to provide evaluation of land parcels for council and for potential joint partnerships. Helen added that the board has directed staff to create profiles for each property on the list and that those have been helpful. These profiles included history, IGA, potential uses, and proposed strategies for acquisition or conservation. Jessamine asked about the current status of Boulder Counties' land evaluation criteria, since the board's evaluation spreadsheet was originally derived from theirs. Ember didn't know. Laura said she'd be curious to see Boulder County and Lafayette's current version of this document and several board members agreed. Charles asked what city council wanted from the board in this process. Ember said that the feedback council has given over the years has indicated that they generally liked the spreadsheet evaluation and map format. Many years ago, the council had a study session about this process with the board. Helen felt that council wanted to see a certain degree of rigor of the process, so the spreadsheet helps with this. Council often asks if the board has looked at a particular parcel. Jessamine pointed out that it has been several years since council gave feedback and wondered if the board should ask the current council for recent feedback. She also wanted to know how the board communicates this information to council, and if the process could be more proactive. She asked if there could be another study session on this topic with council, but Ember said she hadn't heard anything concrete about study sessions between council and the boards for 2022. Laura pointed out that while she is open to improving the process of ranking and evaluating parcels, there is a power in a certain amount of continuity, as it shows consistency when the board prioritizes parcels. David's biggest concern is how accurately the list can convey how seriously the board takes the ranking. He feels like feasibility and cost might need to be part of the process. He added that when a property disappears from the list, it leads to public confusion. He