Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />November 9, 2022 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />better about getting the word out and addressing citizen concerns and rumors on Facebook <br />recently. <br />David said that there is a County -organized process of submitting city -level projects to DRCOG <br />(Denver Regional Council of Government) for funding. One topic is underpasses. The <br />proposed underpass at Highway 42 is one of the proposals from the city to DRCOG. <br />https:Hbouldercounty.gov/transportation/plans-and-projects/dreog-subregional-transportation- <br />improvement-program/ <br />David said there is now a joint tiger team between PPLAB and OSAB. Susan said she is ready <br />to start, but she said she hasn't heard from a PPLAB volunteer yet. David told her to reach out <br />to PPLAB directly. <br />The deadline to reapply for the board is tomorrow. There was some discussion of whether <br />Helen's term was up this December. It was later determined that her term is up in 2024. <br />Jessamine said that she talked to some organizations about getting their assistance with the <br />renewal process for the Open Space and Parks Fund sales tax, including the Nature <br />Conservancy and the Trust for Public Land. The TPL team said that they were willing to help <br />with things like polling and crafting the ballot language but that the City needs to formally <br />request their aid. She thought this was a great opportunity to update ballot language and to <br />analyze things like whether the current tax level is appropriate and whether including tax- <br />sunsetting language on the ballot is necessary. Laura and Helen both thought this sounded <br />amazing. Helen suggested that a brief history of the tax might be helpful to put on the agenda <br />for newer board members. Ember said that the City is asking the board to wait to discuss the <br />ballot measure until February. Helen said that was stupid and Jessamine agreed. Helen said <br />that City's proposed timing will ensure that the board will not have time to have any true input <br />before the tax language is due for the ballot. Helen asked Ember to ask the City Manager's <br />office directly whether the board can present the tax's history to its members, saying she would <br />like to make them actually say no to the board. Helen added that all of this history is public <br />record and thought that it was stupid to limit what could be said about it in a public meeting. <br />Charles thought that if it was presented as an information item rather than a discussion item and <br />he couldn't see why it could possibly be a problem, adding that if they want to remove it from the <br />OSAB December agenda, they should have to do so overtly. Susan and Charles both said that <br />they were new board members and needed context to be thoughtful about the tax. The board <br />wants to put it on the December agenda and see if it gets removed. <br />Charles said the new trail pavement at Dutch Creek looked fine and the half-and-half trail looks <br />finished. Both he and Susan agreed that it looked better as crusher fines and wished it hadn't <br />been paved. <br />Susan is trying to talk to the City Manager about the requiring background checks for Weed <br />Whacker volunteers but has not heard back from them yet. <br />Discussion Item: Vegetation Monitoring of Davidson Mesa 2018-2022. Presented by <br />Jesse Dillon, Cedar Creek Associates, INC. <br />Jesse introduced his company, Cedar Creek. They do ecological monitoring and quantification <br />of data is their specialty. His employee, Gloria, was also in attendance. They used the same <br />protocols as were used by previous consultants monitoring vegetation in 2018 & 2019, to make <br />5 <br />