My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1977 02 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1977 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1977 02 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:11 PM
Creation date
8/24/2009 12:35:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/15/1977
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1977 02 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />February 15, 1977 <br />Minutes - page 5 <br /> <br />L.H.A. CONTINUED <br /> <br />1. The original agreement was for a percent- <br />age of the construction costs; an adjustment <br />was made making the cost a flat fee. <br /> <br />2. An amendment to standard form of agree- <br />ment between owner and architect was made <br />showing that the total amount of fees for the <br />project would not exceed $30,000. <br />Mr. Anderson stated that the Council would <br />need to authorize the Mayor to sign the agree- <br />ment on the changes of the fees not to ex- <br />ceed $30,000. <br /> <br />Councilman DiCarlo moved that the matter be <br />tabled for review until the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl asked if the clause stating that the <br />architects can get no more then $1,200 fee, <br />if the project does not go through was still <br />in effect. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated that it was not. <br />have already been drawn and it is in <br />ment that if the project does not go <br />then there are no further fees to be <br />the architect. <br /> <br />The plans <br />the agree- <br />any further <br />paid to <br /> <br />Mr. Wurl asked what happens if the loan is <br />turned down. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated that out the cost for <br />the initial plans at this time, will be <br />reimbursed back into construction costs. <br />The way it is set up with the contractors is <br />that there would be no charges. <br /> <br />City Attorney Joss stated that there should be <br />some type of clarification on the phrase "not <br />to exceed $30,000", as it reads now the City <br />is open to be paying up to $30,000 even if the <br />project does not go through. <br />After discussion, Councilman Caranci seconded <br />Councilman DiCarlo's motion to table any action <br />on the agreement for study until th~fl~xt . <br />meeting. Question called for. All were in <br />favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson briefly reviewed the budget for <br />the project; which totaled about $686,000. <br />He noted that HUD would be subsidizing the <br />monthly rent costs. <br />He also briefly reviewed the basic structure. <br />There was no further discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.