My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1976 08 10
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1976 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1976 08 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 11:34:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/10/1976
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1976 08 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLO. TECH. CENTER <br /> <br />they have not done the work, where they <br />have not got the data to designations <br />of geologic hazards. I can't say that <br />there is absolutely no probability of <br />failure, I think I have read all the <br />literature they have read, and I recognize <br />the inability of the human to know every- <br />thing and always predict the behavior <br />nature, so I think there is some probability <br />but when I take that one simple fact that <br />in 97 years that the mines have been oper- <br />ating in the Boulder Weld County field and <br />over that 97 years there is not one single <br />substantiated fact of failure or sub- <br />sidence in a mine over 150 feet deep, I <br />am perfectly willing to get up and take <br />the responsibility. I will accept the <br />liability or responsibility that there <br />will not be failure to this land and it <br />can be developed and can be developed <br />to the benefit not only of this community <br />but Boulder County and the people who work <br />there; and I have my neck on the line. <br />I can assure you that somebody loses the <br />corner of their building out there as a <br />result of subsidence and can prove it, I <br />may be out of business. <br />Pat Rogers has taken, I have read his <br />comments, essentially they are general <br />comments; they are related to what has <br />happended in Pennsylvania or Rock Springs, <br />Wyoming, Hungaria, they are facts and <br />figures that can come out of any text book, <br />also made some reinterpretations of our <br />drill holes on this property. They were <br />valid, I don't agree with them obviously; <br />but then it was my people who drilled the <br />holes, logged the holes, and wrote up the <br />descriptions and he took our description <br />and then reinterpreted them. It is sort <br />of like me trying to rewrite Shakespeare. <br />I could do it, but it wouldn't come out <br />as well, because I don't have the experience. <br />He has tried to do this to justify his <br />position I can't accept that. The basic <br />problem is in our professional differences, <br />I see the fact that I have had to do the <br />work or have done the work and reached <br />certain conclusion on the basis of that <br />work and have made certain recommendations. <br />He has reviewed our work and has drawn <br />other conclusions which he feels are in <br />the best interest of the state; and that <br />is the position that we are in. <br />I would be glad to answer any questions. <br /> <br />7. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.