My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2023 08 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2023 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2023 08 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 2:06:43 PM
Creation date
8/16/2023 1:03:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/17/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Councilmember Hamlington asked how accurate the estimated costs for replacement are and there was <br />a discussion about cost estimates. <br />Questions from the Public: None. <br />Solid Waste Hauling Contract Request for Proposals (RFP) Discussion: <br />The Director of Public Works and Utilities presented the Solid Waste RFP process. This process to solicit <br />bids for the next 5-year agreement begins in November. Staff reminded the Committee that this RFP is <br />for a waste hauling service and all vendors will handle the City's waste the same. <br />Questions from the Committee: <br />There was an extensive discussion around the RFP rating system and the committee requested changes <br />to the proposed rating weight percentages, most especially with reference to increasing the weight of <br />customer service as a criterion. Staff will update the RFP rating weights per the Committee's comments. <br />2024/2025 Utility Rate Considerations: <br />The Director of Public Works and Utilities presented the preliminary 2024 utility rate recommendations. <br />There was a discussion around reserve levels, unexpected project costs and the current reserve fund <br />policy for capital projects. The City currently doesn't have contingency for large CIP projects and Public <br />Works is concerned about having reserves to cover unexpected cost increases as projects proceed. <br />Mayor Maloney asked what the 2022 turnback was and asked that it be included in future reports. The <br />Director of Public Works and Utilities noted that having turnback set to zero provides a small layer of <br />contingency and true turnback helps keep rates down. <br />There was a discussion around the City's water rate increases versus the US average CPI. Actual <br />increase amounts will be included in the budgeting process. <br />Questions from the Committee: <br />Councilmember Dickinson asked what has changed in the past few months to change the <br />recommendations from what was presented in February. The Director of Public Works and Utilities <br />indicated that they information that has come to light with the master planning process affected the rate <br />recommendations. Public Works is also now has more information on actual project costs versus <br />estimated costs. It was noted that, with the recent rains, it is likely water revenues will be reduced by <br />around 20%. The City has also been more aggressive with purchasing water rights as water rights are <br />lower in cost at this time and it's prudent to purchase at the current lower rates. <br />Councilmember Hoefner noted that the City's constituents expect a high level of service and reliability <br />and the City's first priority is to ensure service quality and reliability. He noted that being more consistent <br />in rate increases each year would help to avoid very large price shocks in one year. <br />Councilmember Hamlington agreed with Councilmember Hoefner about constituent expectations <br />regarding services. She asked if there were lessons learned from disaster events such as the 2013 flood, <br />Marshall Fire, etc. which impact the planning for reserves. She noted that, given the frequency of these <br />events, keeping a reserve makes sense. <br />The Director of Public Works and Utilities shared approximate costs related to a few major disaster <br />events in the past 10 years and restated that having a reserve is important to the City's ability to <br />continue providing service during these events. <br />4/57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.