My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 05 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1998 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 05 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:57 PM
Creation date
10/22/2009 4:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/5/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1998 05 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />used along the ridge line. She felt strips of green turf would be disturbing to the ridge line. She <br />wanted the noxious weeds killed back. <br /> <br />Davidson called for anyone else wishing to speak on Ordinance No. 1277 and Resolution No.4. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public hearing and called for Council comments or questions. <br /> <br />Mayer suggested dispensing with the 30' and there be an outlot for the trail connection and room for <br />a utility and access easement. <br /> <br />Lathrop wanted to the trail access issue left open and not be site specific until a later date. He did <br />not like the trend developing of Planning Commission members coming to Council with minor issues. <br /> <br />Sisk wanted the rezoning issue resolved. He did not want a gas station or drive-ins on any of the lots. <br /> <br />Keany felt there should be a restriction on west facing signs on Lots 11 - 14. <br /> <br />David Johnson, Etkin Equities, thought the signs facing west applied to Lot 11 - 14. Lots 15 - 18 <br />face Hwy. 42. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that this is an industrial park and gas stations should be allowed. He felt open space <br />al.ong 104th would be the most appropriate place other than the ridge itself He pointed out that the <br />open space definition is different today from what it was years ago. In the '70's it may have been a <br />public use dedication, not an open space dedication. He suggested doing it as fee simple, signing a <br />contract with the property owner for them to maintain it. <br /> <br />Howard did not want to give away the fee simple, but would allow the owners to maintain the <br />property. He did not want the signage to be garish like a lot of neon. He wanted No.4 to read that <br />the more restrictive of the two apply. <br /> <br />Davidson asked for the applicant's summary. <br /> <br />Lee stated that with the buildings along the ridge the setback of 20', with parking as per the <br />stipulation, is a must. If the 110' along Hwy. 42 should become a dedication, then there would be <br />a bigger setback from there and those lots do not work. He asked for a five minute recess for <br />discussion on the dedication. <br /> <br />DA VIDSON CALLED FOR A TEN MINUTE RECESS <br /> <br />Davidson called the meeting back to order. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.