My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1999 01 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1999 01 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:57 PM
Creation date
10/29/2009 10:35:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/5/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1999 01 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
parking is the most efficient in terms of land requirements. Accounting for landscaping, pedestrian <br />ways and typical outdoor amenities, each parking space requires land area above that strictly <br />provided for drive aisles and the parking space itself. Staff has estimated the number of additional <br />parking spaces that could be provided downtown based on two different estimates of parking <br />density -a conservative estimate and an estimate which assumes a more efficient parking lot <br />configuration. The former consumes approximately 450 square feet of land while the latter <br />consumes 355 square feet. The efficient use estimate assumes 100 square feet of land area per space <br />will be dedicated to landscaping, pedestrian ways and outdoor amenities above that required by the <br />space itself. For comparison purposes. the parking lot north of the library uses 530 square feet of <br />land area per space and the recently improved lot along the railroad tracks at Spruce and Front <br />Streets consumes 575 square feet of land area per space excluding the plaza. Both lots provide a <br />significant amount of landscaping as both are in the core area and therefore have a more powerful <br />impact on the streetscape. It is important to note that individual site and land use compatibility <br />constraints will ultimately weigh heavily on the density of parking provided on each site. <br />Staff has estimated the costs associated with providing additional surface parking downtown. This <br />was done to enable Council to establish a reasonable parking improvement fee. Approximately <br />$114,000 was expended to construct the parking lot at Spruce and Front Streets. This figure includes <br />paving, curb, gutter, subgrade, landscaping, lighting, drainage and soft costs. Soft costs include <br />design. engineering, testing and other professional fees and were estimated at 15% of the total hard <br />costs associated with construction. Ten to fifteen percent soft costs are fairly typical in the land <br />development trade. The cost estimate excludes the pedestrian plaza and related landscaping and <br />other improvements directly associated with the plaza. <br />evidenced by the cost of improving the parking lot at Spruce and Front Streets, per space costs were <br />estimated for the following: <br />450 Square Feet Per Space <br />$3,182 <br />355 Square Feet Per Space <br />$2.510 <br />These figures do not include land costs. <br />For comparison purposes, Staff obtained estimates of constructing surface parking from two <br />other sources. A parking consulting organization working with the City of Colorado Springs <br />estimates that it costs between $1500 and $2500 to build each space, exclusive of land costs. <br />BRW, a consulting firm that prepared a parking plan for the City of Fort Collins' downtown <br />estimates the capital costs for each surface space at $2000 per space, again exclusive of land. <br />None of these figures reflect the additional costs of providing the other items previously <br />discussed that Louisville typically associates with downtown parking facilities (landscaping, <br />lighting, outdoor amenities, etc). As large tracts of land that could be made available to surface <br />parking downtown are limited, the benefit imparted by economies of scale are constrained, thus <br />further increasing the likely construction costs. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.