Laserfiche WebLink
MOBLEY ANNEXATION <br />(1) RESOLUTION NO. 80, SERIES i996 FINDING SUBSTANTIAL <br />COMPLIANCE FOR AN ANNEXATION FILED WITH THE CITY OF <br />LOUISVILLE, COLORADO, KNOWN AS THE MOBLEY ANNEXATION, <br />AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON <br />Paul Wood reviewed Resolution No. 80 and Ordinance No. 1244, Series 1996. He stated that <br />Resolution No. 80 was of substantial compliance for an annexation. The property is approximately <br />13 acres at the northeast corner of Dillon Road and South 96th Street. The property is occupied by <br />one single family home with associated out buildings. The property owner was requesting the <br />property be zoned Agricultural. <br />Sisk moved that Council approve Resolution No. 80, Series 1996, seconded by Keany. All in favor <br />with Howard being absent. <br />(2) ORDINANCE NO. 1244, SERIES 1996 APPROVING AN ANNEXATION, <br />KNOWN AS THE MOBLEY ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF <br />LOUISVILLE, COLORADO 1ST READING SET PUBLIC HEARING <br />1/21/97 <br />Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No. 1244, Series 1996, "An ordinance approving an annexation, <br />known as the Mobley Annexation to the. City of Louisville, Colorado." <br />Sisk moved that Council approve Ordinance No. 1244, place it out for publication, and set the public <br />hearing for January 21, 1997, seconded by Keany. <br />Lathrop would not be able to be at the January 21 meeting and he wanted the provision for the two <br />1" water taps to be discussed at the 21st meeting. <br />All in favor with Howard being absent. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION COLONY SQUARE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />REPLAT AND PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the preliminary PUD reflected retail buildings A D on <br />Lots 1 and 3, a 6,850 s.f retail building on Lot 1, and a Burger King at 3,725 s.f. on Lot 2 for a total <br />of 52,725 s.f. They proposed 240 parking spaces for the project, below the minimum required. The <br />applicant requested a variance in the number of parking spaces as there is shared parking available <br />from Lot 5 or Mann Theatres. He pointed out that staff wanted to work with the applicant to <br />upgrade the architectural statement to make a more positive statement in terms of the backs of the <br />buildings facing both the right -of -way, Dillon, and Comfort Inn. It was the position of staff that the <br />project is under parked for the amount of retail space proposed. <br />8 <br />