City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 09 02

Home Browse Search

subparagraph No. 2 be incorporated as approved uses on the PUD amendment. The site plan remained in tact based upon Council's initial review. Architecturally the building retained the components consistent with Century Office Park. Landscaping complied with the landscaping plan for the park and open space had been increased from 39% to 43 He felt more emphasis on signage would be appropriate with this PUD discussion. Planning Commission held a public hearing May 22 and approved their Resolution No. 20, Series 1997, with 16 conditions. The revised PUD reflected compliance with all conditions of approval. A note had been added on the PUD in compliance with the Commission action that restricted strictly retail tenants to a maximum of 9,000 s.f. Resolution No. 27 had two conditions: 1.) The wattage of the wall mounted light fixture shall be reduced to a maximum of 175 watts.; 2.) The PUD note regarding square footage limitation of retail uses shall be removed if inconsistent with final action by City Council. He suggested that Council limit the maximum overall height of the building to 29'. Davidson reiterated that, as was discussed in the last meeting before this was continued, the City Attorney rendered her opinion making it clear that the City Council does not have authority to grant a use -by -right for special review use on blanket orders. There would be no use discussing that: Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. Don Slack, SEM Architects, Inc., 7935 East Prentice Avenue, #102, Englewood, Colorado 80111, felt there was a need for clarification regarding uses within the BO zoning as service uses. Davidson called for Council questions. Sisk felt it was clear what was meant on the original PUD. He felt the applicant was asking for an expansion of the BO zoning. Mayer preferred to leave things as they are. Howard and Keany thought it would-be hard to make a decision with the proposal the way it is. Lathrop wanted the BO zoning to stand as it is and any marginal use could be reviewed by staff. If it doesn't fit, it would need to go to a special use review. Davidson asked the applicants if they would like to stick with the PUD that is currently approved. Tim Hadjis, Eastcor Company, 14 Inverness Drive East, Suite A -218, Englewood, Colorado 80112, stated that they were not looking for any retail approval tonight. They were willing to proceed with this and not put any notes on their PUD. Davidson moved to approve Resolution No. 27, Series 1997, adding condition No. 3 saying, "This approval does not constitute approval of commencement of any use other than those listed in the Louisville Municipal Code Section 17.12.030, use groups 12, 24, 29, and 42 as uses expressly 5