My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 04 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 04 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 8:41:13 AM
Creation date
4/12/2010 1:25:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 04 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 25, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 19 <br />Lipton confirmed the annexation is to the City of Louisville from unincorporated <br />Boulder County. <br />Lipton continued with a discussion of the procedures for the evening as follows: <br />• Staff Report — Update <br />• Finance Director — Fiscal Impact Report <br />• Open Space Advisory Board (OSAB) — comments <br />• Applicant — New information <br />• Public comment — five (5) minutes per person <br />• Commissioner questions of staff and applicant <br />• Staff and Applicant final comments <br />• Close the public hearing <br />• Commission discussion and motion of approval <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />McCartney stated he had no PowerPoint presenta <br />requested a motion to enter into public record tho <br />and not included the meeting p <br />Loo moved and O'Connell secon <br />record. Motion passed by voice vo <br />McCartney discussed the following: <br />following": <br />A. The proposed use of all lands wit the subject property (also stated in <br />Section 17.72.090.B for PCZD-C ricts); <br />B. The type or character of developme t and the number of dwelling units <br />per gross acre proposed; <br />C. The proposed location of school sites, parks, open spaces, recreation <br />facilities and o <br />D. The proposed <br />general street pl <br />r the evening. He <br />titters and emails received <br />n to enter those items into public <br />17.72.030, a GDP "shall set forth the <br />and quasi -public facilities; <br />I streets shall be coordinated with the adopted <br />or the city. <br />McCartney stated the fing with regard to each of GDP requirements: <br />A. The ap • -nt .. listed the proposed land uses in a table entitled <br />"Permitte• -s", under the column "Permitted Uses". The uses comply <br />with the use established in Section 17.72.090. <br />B. The type and character of the development is listed in the table entitled <br />"Permitted Uses", under the column "Comments/Remarks". The density is <br />listed under the table entitled "Site Information" on the row entitled "Gross <br />Developable Area". <br />C. The proposed locations of the parks or open spaces are not delineated on <br />the GDP. Staff continues to work with the applicant on how the 12% <br />public land dedication will be allocated on the site, and it has not been <br />determined if all of the public land will be located on this site or if there will <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.