My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1974 10 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1974 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1974 10 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:34 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 9:23:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/2/1974
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1974 10 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.�' %�►.�'v�•f^r►-ter. • ..� r .,_a' s.Rl•X�aw ♦ " .y' : Stir r .. <br /> 411 4110 <br /> . a <br /> • <br /> .a' <br /> r V <br /> • <br /> SPROUL coned Councilman Domenico stated that he felt <br /> ORDINANCE #442 Boulder will move in on Louisville and <br /> this should be considered with Sproul. <br /> Mr. Sproul stated that with all the <br /> Council comments he felt it best that <br /> Sproul request withdrawal of the annexation <br /> petition. A hand written letter requesting <br /> withdrawal was given to Attorney Morris <br /> by Mr. Steve Sproul. <br /> Councilman DiCarlo moved that Council <br /> accept Mr. Sproule request for withdrawal <br /> of the annexation petition. Seconded <br /> by Councilwoman Scholl. Roll call on <br /> motion. Domenico yes, Berry yes, Scholl <br /> yes, Dhieux yes, DelPizzo yes, DiCarlo <br /> yes. Motion carried. <br /> Councilwoman Dhieux stated that she felt <br /> the annexation fee which has already been <br /> paid should be taken into consideration <br /> should they come back for repetition. <br /> Attorney Morris stated that on the time <br /> limit there is nothing found in the <br /> state statute on it and they are gen- <br /> erally found under Ordinance and there <br /> was nothing in the City Ordinances in <br /> regards to this. The acceptance of <br /> Mr. Sprouls withdrawal request has <br /> voided out Ordinances #442 and #443. <br /> ORDINANCE #452 Mr. Morris stated that this Ordinance <br /> is in the final statges and want it states <br /> is that any work under $200.00 does not <br /> require a building fee. He stated <br /> that Mr. Stephan, the building inspector <br /> felt that any electrical, plumbing. or <br /> heating work should require a building <br /> permit and inspection. <br /> It was brought up about furnaces having <br /> to be moved because they were placed in <br /> the wrong place in the home but passed <br /> inspection. Mrs . Barbara McDonald stated <br /> that she had purchased a Wood Bros. home <br /> • and has had to have the plumbing redone <br /> along with other major repairs and she <br /> felt the building inspector did not do <br /> justifiable work as to inspecting her <br /> own home. <br /> • Mr. Wurl stated that there also could <br /> have been the material which was used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.