My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1977 04 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1977 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1977 04 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:37 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:15:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
4/5/1977
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1977 04 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item S. Items from people in attendance not appearing on the agenda. <br /> Item 6. City Attorney's Report <br /> A. Ordinance No. 532 - Massage Parlors 2nd Reading <br /> N. Ordinance No. 533 - Annexation Sewer Plant Property - 2nd Reading <br /> C. Or finance No. 38 - Model Ilraffic Code - lit Rea,_di,, <br /> • s as up to o t e st traffic code. <br /> • <br /> D. Ordinance No. 539 - Police Care Lease - let Reading <br /> E. Ordinance No. 540 - Obsenity - let Reading <br /> F. Ordinance No. 541 - Zoning Restriction - Adult Movie Theatres <br /> let Reading <br /> G. Resolution No. 3 - Community evelopment Funding <br /> This rsfatss to requeiE on the part of a group that has <br /> been formed requesting of Congress that they continue <br /> the funding at the present level in the 750 cities that <br /> are intitlement cities, that are under 50 thousand in - <br /> population, which area vs fall into. Recommendation <br /> that Council adopt Resolution No. 3. <br /> Item 7. City Administrator's Report <br /> A. 208 Waste Water Management <br /> Enclosed under separate cover the information relating to <br /> 208 Waste Water Management. If you recall sometime back <br /> we took the position that we would rather that Boulder <br /> County be the planning agency for 208 in place of DRCOG. <br /> What I have enclosed is an evaluation from DRCOG and a <br /> summary from DRCOG as to why they feel thats not appro- <br /> priate. I've also enclosed the comments from the County. <br /> It basically appears that our decision should be based on <br /> who would we prefer to deal with in the future as relates <br /> to sewer waste water treatment, management, waste water <br /> treatment grants and so forth. I think we simply have <br /> to decide who we have the most confidence in and who we <br /> feel we can work with the best. <br /> •7 <br /> 3. Colorado Mbnici,pal League Regusst' - Re - Mountain Bell - . <br /> Niountan Sail as you Um, has applied for a substantial <br /> increase in telephone rates. Normally when this happens <br /> the Colorado tnicipal League hires competent attorneys <br /> to fight that request. They are presently in the throws <br /> of doing so. What they have asked us for is a comittment, <br /> outlined in the letter, for our share of the cost. Recom- <br /> mending that we do so. <br /> C. Public Service • Franchise <br /> ITve enc`iosia in the paciet a copy of the Public Service <br /> proposed franchise and the suggested calendar.of how this <br /> could be adapted. This is required to be published three <br /> times' before it's 'consid.rad by Council. It has been <br /> published once. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.