My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 06 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 06 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/1/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 06 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5/18/82 Page -9- <br /> Louisville such a beautiful, small city <br /> to live in. In conclusion he stated he <br /> supported the increase, but did not support <br /> the rate structure recoc *snded by staff <br /> and Council. <br /> Mayor Meier Replied to the rate structure concern - <br /> advised ft was not recommended by City <br /> Staff was � <br /> to beneflitb . s reason <br /> theperon who <br /> was trying to conserve water. <br /> Administrator Wurl Advised when the proposal was being ini- <br /> tiated staff had provided Council with <br /> 5 alternatives and the flier that was <br /> supplied was a result of several study <br /> sessions considered best. Stated it was <br /> difficult to comment because he did not <br /> have the original alternatives with him. <br /> The basis however for the entire structure <br /> was to provide sufficient funds to meet the <br /> operation and maintenance costs of the <br /> water system. Wurl invited Mr. Yekel to <br /> meet with him to review all the proposals_ <br /> He further explained basically in the last <br /> 5 year period the revenues did not cover <br /> the expenditures for either the water or <br /> sewer departments. The approximate deficit <br /> figure for 1981 was $150,000.00. Referring <br /> to the rate structure - in the final analysis <br /> the residents pay for the water and sewer <br /> systax and this structure will provide the <br /> needed revenue. Wurl also stated this rate <br /> structure would substantially increase the <br /> commercial and industrial users. <br /> Ray Woodbury Commented he too had problems with the <br /> 2157 Centennial Drive flier as it was not particularly informative <br /> in his estimation. He as also concerned <br /> with the $126,000.00 to improve a fa-ility <br /> that was built in 1934. He asked if there <br /> wasn't something prior to this time where <br /> funds were needed. He had no problem with <br /> the improvement of the Eldorado Springs <br /> diversion facility amounting to $50,000.00. <br /> Then stated the increase for water was $2.50, <br /> for water bond increase $2 . 15 for a total <br /> of $4.65 multiplied by the number of residents <br /> in the City of Louiiville - approximately <br /> 5,000 homes which amounts to $23,250.00 per <br /> month, multiply this by 12 and it equals <br /> $279,000. 00 per year. Again mentioned <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.