My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 06 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 06 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/1/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 06 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_,w --b---• , <br /> = 4,. :+'T R . <br /> r - <br /> 5/18/82 Page -2- <br /> Councilwoman Morris Stated she had questions regarding the <br /> City's role with the Chamber of Commerce <br /> both as a dues paying member and a voting <br /> member. It was her feeling there maybe possibId <br /> conflicts. She referred to Governmental <br /> Relations in the Chamber's statement of <br /> Goals - "is to be effective in the local <br /> political process of recruiting, *looting, <br /> and appointing candidates to public office, <br /> as well as influencing special issue elections.' <br /> It Was her feeling this was in direct con- <br /> flict with the City. She felt that perhaps <br /> the City should be an associate umber whereby <br /> the City could be supportive of the informative <br /> services but did not favor being a voting <br /> member. <br /> Councilman Leary Concurred with Councilwoman Morris and felt <br /> councilmembers should reconsider their mem- <br /> bership.and definitely not pay dues. It <br /> was his feeling the City is not a private <br /> organization and does not exist for commer- <br /> cial interests. Also, he felt there was <br /> a -potential for City-Chamber conflict. He <br /> cited the Neodata issue - if the City was <br /> a dues paying member, using taxpayers money. <br /> on an issue which has not been resolved. <br /> The Chamber has supported Neodata. while <br /> there are taxpayers in the community who <br /> have shown opposition; therefore he felt <br /> those citizens were being shorted in this <br /> situation. He also felt that if any issues <br /> were going to be supported or candidates, <br /> that supporting the Chamber with funds <br /> would place the City in direct conflict with <br /> the Campaign Act of 1974. Councilman Leary <br /> also felt it would be a luxury item to pay <br /> dues at this time. <br /> Councilman Cummings Commented that if Council should decide to <br /> pay dues and become a voting member. he felt <br /> the City's vote could become a strong in- <br /> fluence of what Councilmembers felt could <br /> distract from the City's to citizens interest. <br /> It was ::is feeling there wasn'_t a difference <br /> of a councilmember supporting any issue. i.e. <br /> Neodata. Chamber of Commerce, etc. using his <br /> influence - to use that as a detriment to <br /> this group. He commented he felt dues would <br /> be a show of support and didn't feel that <br /> the Chamber of Commerce uses their influence <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.